Classifying the fecal form of omnivores, vegetarians, and vegans.
How contaminated is the American meat supply with fecal matter?
Last year, the University of Bristol celebrated their 100 year anniversary. Prestigious institution of higher learning. Produced nine Nobel laureates and the Bristol Stool Scale, a medical tool used to classify the fecal form. Seven different classifications.
Type 1: Looks like rabbit droppings. Separate hard lumps, like nuts, hard to pass.
Type 2: Looks like a, buncha grapes. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy.
Type 3: Looks like corn on the cob.
Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft.
Type 5: Looks like chicken nuggets. I don’t think I’ll be able to look at chicken nuggets quite the same way ever again.
Type 6: looks like porridge, and Type 7: Looks like gravy. You got to love them Brits.
The best #2 is a #4, a smooth and soft snake. Unfortunately, only a minority of adults enjoy normal bowel function, and only about half pass normal stools. Wow. And younger women, due to hormonal fluctuations throughout their cycle, are particularly disadvantaged. But this is for people eating a standard Western diet. Wouldn’t it be neat if some reserachers compared bowel function measurements between individuals eating different diets? It would, and they did.
Bowel function was assessed: omnivores, versus vegetarians, versus vegans. Each subject was provided with a “stool collection kit,” a stack-a-boxes each used to accommodate one stool only, reducing the risk of specimens becoming squashed. They weren’t messing around.
So, meat-eaters versus plant-eaters, put to the test. First question: where did the meat-eaters fall. Does the average bowel movement of meateaters look like rabbit droppings, bunches of grapes, corn on the cob, a smooth and soft sausage, chicken nuggets, oatmeal, or gravy.
Meateaters, on average, poop out corn cob stools. What about vegetarians? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7? #4, right where we want to be. And finally, what about vegans, on average? Number 4 as well.
But, vegans actually ended up beating vegetarians, because none of the vegans had the hard rabbit-turd stools, whereas a few of the vegetarians, like a bunch of the meat-eaters, struggled to pass type 1’s. And, the smoooooth vegan snakes were softer—exactly 18% softer. How could they tell? Using a stool penetrometer of course.
An editorial in the Canadian Medical Association Journal celebrated the finding this year, calling on doctors to tell all their patients to eat a plant-based diet, as vegetarian diets can only help push patients into the comfortable middle range of the much-beloved Bristol Stool Scale.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by veganmontreal.
To help out on the site please email email@example.com
Please feel free to post any ask-the-doctor type questions here in the comments section and I’d be happy to try to answer them. And check out the other videos on stool. Also, there are 1,686 other subjects covered in the rest of my videos--please feel free to explore them as well!
For some context, please check out my associated blog posts: Bowel Movements: The Scoop on Poop, Kiwi Fruit for Irritable Bowel Syndrome, NutritionFacts.org: the first month, Boosting Gut Flora Without Probiotics, and Best Treatment for Constipation
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.
Certain fish accumulate waxy substances within their bodies that can present an unpleasant surprise to consumers.
DONATE TODAY and help keep NutritionFacts growing strong!Donate