Doctor's Note

Please feel free to post any ask-the-doctor type questions here in the comments section and I’d be happy to try to answer them. And check out theother videos on animal products. Also, there are 1,449 other subjects covered in the rest of my videos--please feel free to explore them as well!

For some context, please check out my associated blog posts: Harvard’s Meat and Mortality StudiesBreast Cancer and Diet Pollutants in Californian Breast Tissue, and Avoiding Dairy to Prevent Parkinson's

  • Michael Greger M.D.

    Please feel free to post any ask-the-doctor type questions here in the comments section and I’d be happy to try to answer them. And check out the other videos on animal products. Also, there are 1,449 other subjects covered in the rest of my videos–please feel free to explore them as well!

  • wickedchicken

    HOW do national guidelines not take these facts into account, considering that the USA, UK, Canada, Ireland etc all reccomend meat and dairy with no mention of a possible side effect??? I wonder if they talk about studies like this at their review boards? Strange that these findings get little attention from HCPs. There’s a lot of paranoid members of the public out there, who think the government is out to GET them, and the big industries are out to get us all….but it can’t be the case.

    I’m just saying, what is the greater context of the studies?? Is it just one study showing this? [or the few you mentioned]. Are there other studies showing opposite results? It’s hard to believe, if evidence is all pointing in the direction you have highlighted, that this could slip through the cracks for health and nutrition recommendations.

    VERY interesting and informative videos I must say; gets people thinking, in a good way! I find journals hard to read and digest, and way too vast, so I am finding your videos just wonderful. Many thanks.

  • DrDons

    The key studies that Dr. Greger and others such as Dr. McDougall point out are contained within the over 10,000 articles per week that are added to the medical literature. Dr. Greger reviews between 6 -7000 articles annually on human nutrition alone. The literature shows that protocols and guidelines developed by “expert consensus” are usually not based on the best science or valid statistical methods. The other issue is the influence of food and pharmaceutical industries. You can read Marion Nestles “Food Politics” to get a sense for how bad it is. Ernie Bodai MD who was the physician who conceived and championed the breast cancer stamp relates that he was surprised by the opposition of breast cancer research groups who feared it would take funding away from them. I know of no studies that support the consumption of meat, dairy and eggs unless in the face of starvation. I guess the short answer is that the important studies don’t even make it to the cracks to slip through! Nutritionfacts.org fills an important void in that it sifts through all the studies and gives the rest of us the “executive summary”… so keep tuned as the science adds to our understanding every month.

    • martintaylor67

      I had to read rightto the bottom of this comment before I could tell it was a positive comment. I thought you were slating Dr. Greger. Thank goodness you are not.

  • Michael Greger M.D.

    For some context, please check out my associated blog post Harvard’s Meat and Mortality Studies!

  • DanielFaster

    Wow, this kicks back the clock. Is this like the oldest, firstest — and BESTEST!!! – video ever on nutrionfacts.org?

    • Thea

      DanielFaster: :-) Fun comment.

      I don’t know about bestest since there are just so many good ones. But I totally agree this is a really, really, really good one.

      • DanielFaster

        At 1500 we’re approaching the point where it may be impossible for someone with a job at least to watch them all in one lifetime lol. As far as I can see this one has no previous video tab. It might be interesting to have a date-title index, perhaps a project for a volunteer. :-)

  • Alexis Stinton

    History shows that meat was extremely important for people that lived in colder climates. Grains were harvested for human consumption while grasses, alfalfa and cornstalks (foods not digestible by humans) were fed to the ruminant animals. There was not the competition for grain that there is now; feeding grain to animals for marbling is a relatively new phenomenon. People would feed the animal through the winter and use the dairy which is a complete protein. Sheep and goats were perfect because they are easier to keep rather then the less efficient cattle we consume today. When grasses ran out for the animals and grains for the people, the animals were then consumed. Today it is too easy to get a quick meat meal from a burger joint. Meat is processed from the feed lots to the packing plants neatly packaged product. We are a spoiled nation that wastes 40% of the food that is produced and have a craving for anything sweet and processed. In my opinion, the best diet is one that is balanced with no artificial preservatives, sweeteners or refined products. I see nothing wrong with grass fed meats and veggies grown from animal “out puts”.

    • Toxins

      Moderation is a tricky philosophy because people do not really understands what moderation is nor do they know how to moderate themselves. As shared by Jeff Novick:
      The items we know that are causing harm to Americans right now are the excess consumption of added sugars, refined grains, sodium, fat, and saturated fat. How much of these items are Americans consuming?

      Added Sugars – 242% over the recommended upper limit.

      Refined Grains – 200% over the recommended upper limit.

      Sodium – 229% over the recommended upper limit.

      Saturated fats – 158% over the recommended upper limit.

      Solid fats – 281% over the recommended upper limit.

      These are things we can no longer consume in “moderation”, because clearly their currently level of of consumption is above and beyond the upper limits. What we need is a dramatic reduction in these foods to get back to safe levels. On the other side of it, there are healthy foods that are truly eaten in only moderation

      Fruits – only 42% of the recommended minimum intake.

      Vegetables – only 59% of the recommended minimum intake.

      Whole Grains – only 15% of the recommended minimum intake.

      Fiber – only 40% of the recommended minimum intake.

      These are foods we need to dramatically increase the consumption of.

      http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=18349

      • VegAtHeart

        That’s a great point! For those interested, it is also possible to easily compare the foods eaten in the US to other countries using the food balance tables, which is accessible under the browse data tab.