Should the vitamin D levels found in lifeguards be considered the norm for our species, given the fact that we evolved running around naked all day in equatorial Africa?
Evolutionary Argument for Optimal Vitamin D Level
5/5 - (9 votes)
The Institute of Medicine’s target vitamin D level corresponds with what one finds out in the general population. Normal people getting about an hour of sun a day have about 20 to 30 nanograms per milliliter. This is in nanomoles per liter, which corresponds to about 27 nanograms per milliliter, whereas lifeguards, who spend more like eight hours in the sun every day, have abnormally high levels, like over 60. Others, however, interpret this data differently, suggesting that the vitamin D levels in the lifeguards are the ones that are normal, and the “normals” are actually vitamin D-deficient.
We did, after all, live as naked creatures in the East African tropics for about a million years before we began using animal skins as capes to cover our shoulders. But tailored clothing, something like we know it today, was not devised until about 40,000 years ago, when needles first appear in the archaeological record. The invention of tailored clothing may have been an important factor enabling the first modern human beings to settle permanently in Europe, with its cold winters, about 30,000 years ago. In Africa there was plenty of sunshine and plenty of vitamin D. Not so in Europe, where there were long winters, and people covered in clothing.
This must have been when our species first began to evolve a lighter skin as an adaptation to the shortage of sunshine and vitamin D. It wasn’t until we started living in the sunless alleys of smog ridden cities did rickets rear its ugly head, and we had to start fortifying our food supply with D.
So instead of a blood level of 20, maybe we should shoot for what farmers in Puerto Rico get, or lifeguards from Israel and St. Louie.
Just because those levels might really be normal for our species doesn’t necessarily mean, though, that they’re the best. There’s a reason people tan; that’s our body producing more melanin to protect itself. There’s a reason we as a species evolved with a built-in SPF-15 in our beautiful black African skin. So while maybe normal now is too low, maybe normal then was too high.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by veganmontreal.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. 2011.
- Hollis BW. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Indicative of Vitamin D Sufficiency: Implications for Establishing a New Effective Dietary Intake Recommendation for Vitamin D. J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):317-22.
- Gillie O. Blinded by science, pragmatism forgotten. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Apr;14(4):566-7.
- Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 May;69(5):842-56.
Images thanks to the US National Library of Medicine and daryl_mitchell / Flickr
The Institute of Medicine’s target vitamin D level corresponds with what one finds out in the general population. Normal people getting about an hour of sun a day have about 20 to 30 nanograms per milliliter. This is in nanomoles per liter, which corresponds to about 27 nanograms per milliliter, whereas lifeguards, who spend more like eight hours in the sun every day, have abnormally high levels, like over 60. Others, however, interpret this data differently, suggesting that the vitamin D levels in the lifeguards are the ones that are normal, and the “normals” are actually vitamin D-deficient.
We did, after all, live as naked creatures in the East African tropics for about a million years before we began using animal skins as capes to cover our shoulders. But tailored clothing, something like we know it today, was not devised until about 40,000 years ago, when needles first appear in the archaeological record. The invention of tailored clothing may have been an important factor enabling the first modern human beings to settle permanently in Europe, with its cold winters, about 30,000 years ago. In Africa there was plenty of sunshine and plenty of vitamin D. Not so in Europe, where there were long winters, and people covered in clothing.
This must have been when our species first began to evolve a lighter skin as an adaptation to the shortage of sunshine and vitamin D. It wasn’t until we started living in the sunless alleys of smog ridden cities did rickets rear its ugly head, and we had to start fortifying our food supply with D.
So instead of a blood level of 20, maybe we should shoot for what farmers in Puerto Rico get, or lifeguards from Israel and St. Louie.
Just because those levels might really be normal for our species doesn’t necessarily mean, though, that they’re the best. There’s a reason people tan; that’s our body producing more melanin to protect itself. There’s a reason we as a species evolved with a built-in SPF-15 in our beautiful black African skin. So while maybe normal now is too low, maybe normal then was too high.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by veganmontreal.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. 2011.
- Hollis BW. Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Indicative of Vitamin D Sufficiency: Implications for Establishing a New Effective Dietary Intake Recommendation for Vitamin D. J Nutr. 2005 Feb;135(2):317-22.
- Gillie O. Blinded by science, pragmatism forgotten. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Apr;14(4):566-7.
- Vieth R. Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 May;69(5):842-56.
Images thanks to the US National Library of Medicine and daryl_mitchell / Flickr
Comparte "Evolutionary Argument for Optimal Vitamin D Level"
Términos
Puedes compartir este material en la red o impreso bajo nuestra licencia Creative Commons. Deberás atribuir el artículo a NutritionFacts.org y agregar la liga a nuestro sitio en tu publicación
Si se realizan cambios en el texto o video original, se debe indicar, razonablemente, lo que ha cambiado en relación con el artículo o el video.
No se puede usar nuestro contenido para propósitos comerciales.
No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan a otros a hacer cualquier cosa permitida aquí.
Si tienes alguna duda, por favor Contáctanos
Título
Evolutionary Argument for Optimal Vitamin D Level
LicenciaCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
URLNota del Doctor
This is the second in a nine-part series on vitamin D. Be sure to check out yesterday’s video: Vitamin D Recommendations Changed.
For more context, check out my associated blog posts: Vitamin D: Shedding some light on the new recommendations, and Vitamin D from Mushrooms, Sun, or Supplements?.
Si no lo has hecho aún, puedes suscribirte a mis videos de forma gratuita haciendo click aquí. Lee esta información importante sobre las traducciones aquí.
Video anterior
Siguiente video
