Dietary Guidelines: Science vs. Corporate Interests

Dietary Guidelines: Science vs. Corporate Interests
5 (100%) 8 votes

The USDA Dietary Guidelines Committee stands accused of ignoring the science to justify its recommendation to eat meat.

Comenta
Comparte

Commentators on the USDA Dietary Guidelines Committee recommendations note that there is “no discussion at all of the scientific research on the health consequences of eating meat. If the Committee actually discussed this research, it would be unable to justify its recommendation to eat meat, as the research would show that meat increases the risks of chronic diseases, contrary to the purposes of the Guidelines. Thus, by simply ignoring that research, the Committee is able to reach a conclusion that would otherwise look improper.”

We know that “[a] plant-based diet of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and no meat reversed heart disease, completely prevented deaths from heart disease, and slowed the progression of cancer, and an almost identical diet is promoted by the [World Cancer Research Fund] to prevent cancer, as based on the largest review of scientific studies to date.”

The best summary of the dietary guidelines that I’ve found comes not from Greece, which I talked about before, not from Harvard, but from a cartoonist, Jimmy Johnson: “The new dietary guidelines have been released. They tell us to eat healthier. But, not so healthy as to noticeably affect any corporate profits. I’m paraphrasing, of course.”

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Peter Mellor.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Cartoon: ARLO AND JANIS © 2011 Jimmy Johnson. Reprinted by permission of Universal Uclick for UFS.  All rights reserved.  Image thanks to familymwr.

Commentators on the USDA Dietary Guidelines Committee recommendations note that there is “no discussion at all of the scientific research on the health consequences of eating meat. If the Committee actually discussed this research, it would be unable to justify its recommendation to eat meat, as the research would show that meat increases the risks of chronic diseases, contrary to the purposes of the Guidelines. Thus, by simply ignoring that research, the Committee is able to reach a conclusion that would otherwise look improper.”

We know that “[a] plant-based diet of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and no meat reversed heart disease, completely prevented deaths from heart disease, and slowed the progression of cancer, and an almost identical diet is promoted by the [World Cancer Research Fund] to prevent cancer, as based on the largest review of scientific studies to date.”

The best summary of the dietary guidelines that I’ve found comes not from Greece, which I talked about before, not from Harvard, but from a cartoonist, Jimmy Johnson: “The new dietary guidelines have been released. They tell us to eat healthier. But, not so healthy as to noticeably affect any corporate profits. I’m paraphrasing, of course.”

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Peter Mellor.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Cartoon: ARLO AND JANIS © 2011 Jimmy Johnson. Reprinted by permission of Universal Uclick for UFS.  All rights reserved.  Image thanks to familymwr.

Nota del Doctor

Be sure to check out all my other videos on dietary guidelines and heart disease

If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.

Comment Etiquette

On NutritionFacts.org, you'll find a vibrant community of nutrition enthusiasts, health professionals, and many knowledgeable users seeking to discover the healthiest diet to eat for themselves and their families. As always, our goal is to foster conversations that are insightful, engaging, and most of all, helpful – from the nutrition beginners to the experts in our community.

To do this we need your help, so here are some basic guidelines to get you started.

The Short List

To help maintain and foster a welcoming atmosphere in our comments, please refrain from rude comments, name-calling, and responding to posts that break the rules (see our full Community Guidelines for more details). We will remove any posts in violation of our rules when we see it, which will, unfortunately, include any nicer comments that may have been made in response.

Be respectful and help out our staff and volunteer health supporters by actively not replying to comments that are breaking the rules. Instead, please flag or report them by submitting a ticket to our help desk. NutritionFacts.org is made up of an incredible staff and many dedicated volunteers that work hard to ensure that the comments section runs smoothly and we spend a great deal of time reading comments from our community members.

Have a correction or suggestion for video or blog? Please contact us to let us know. Submitting a correction this way will result in a quicker fix than commenting on a thread with a suggestion or correction.

View the Full Community Guidelines

Deja una respuesta

Tu correo electrónico no se publicará Los campos obligatorios están marcados *

Pin It en Pinterest

Share This