Antimutagenic Activity of Green vs. White Tea

Antimutagenic Activity of Green vs. White Tea
4.83 (96.67%) 6 votes

The ability of green versus white tea to protect against in vitro DNA damage caused by a cooked chicken carcinogen (heterocyclic amine).

Comenta
Comparte

The same leaves of the same plant are used to make white, green, oolong, and black tea. The primary difference is how they’re processed, with white being the least processed, and black being the most.

In one of the videos I made a few years ago, I talked about how the tea with the most antioxidant power was green tea—unless you added lemon, in which case white tea pulls ahead. But what about going a step further and testing their respective abilities to prevent DNA damage?

Previous studies have shown that, “The degree of protection against DNA damage by tea appeared to be related to the extent of processing, since green tea was generally more effective than black tea. This suggested the possibility that higher antimutagenic or anticarcinogenic activity might be expected from teas that have undergone the least amount of processing.” So, they compared the antimutagenic activity of white tea in comparison with green tea.

Bacteria, just like every other living creature, uses the same DNA that we do. So, one common test to see if something is carcinogenic is to drip it on Salmonella growing in a petri dish, and see if it causes DNA mutations. And to test if something protects DNA, you add it along with the carcinogen, and see if there are fewer mutations.

The carcinogen they picked for this test was a doozy: 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo-4,5-b-pyridine, a heterocyclic amine found mostly in grilled, fried, and broiled chicken—added with green tea or white tea to see what would happen.

Here’s with the green tea. By dripping on green tea, you could drop the number of DNA mutations caused by the carcinogen by more than a half. But here’s the white. Appeared to completely 100% block the DNA damage.

And the longer you brew it, the better. This is against another cooked meat carcinogen. You’ll often see a recommendation to only brew white tea one or two minutes, but if you go out to five, you can get significantly more DNA protection.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Serena.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Images thanks to Prenn and Edgar181 via Wikimedia Commons.

The same leaves of the same plant are used to make white, green, oolong, and black tea. The primary difference is how they’re processed, with white being the least processed, and black being the most.

In one of the videos I made a few years ago, I talked about how the tea with the most antioxidant power was green tea—unless you added lemon, in which case white tea pulls ahead. But what about going a step further and testing their respective abilities to prevent DNA damage?

Previous studies have shown that, “The degree of protection against DNA damage by tea appeared to be related to the extent of processing, since green tea was generally more effective than black tea. This suggested the possibility that higher antimutagenic or anticarcinogenic activity might be expected from teas that have undergone the least amount of processing.” So, they compared the antimutagenic activity of white tea in comparison with green tea.

Bacteria, just like every other living creature, uses the same DNA that we do. So, one common test to see if something is carcinogenic is to drip it on Salmonella growing in a petri dish, and see if it causes DNA mutations. And to test if something protects DNA, you add it along with the carcinogen, and see if there are fewer mutations.

The carcinogen they picked for this test was a doozy: 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenyl-imidazo-4,5-b-pyridine, a heterocyclic amine found mostly in grilled, fried, and broiled chicken—added with green tea or white tea to see what would happen.

Here’s with the green tea. By dripping on green tea, you could drop the number of DNA mutations caused by the carcinogen by more than a half. But here’s the white. Appeared to completely 100% block the DNA damage.

And the longer you brew it, the better. This is against another cooked meat carcinogen. You’ll often see a recommendation to only brew white tea one or two minutes, but if you go out to five, you can get significantly more DNA protection.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Serena.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Images thanks to Prenn and Edgar181 via Wikimedia Commons.

Nota del Doctor

The antioxidant data with that interesting lemon juice result can be found in Green Tea vs. White. Other interesting videos on tea include Dietary Brain Wave Alteration and Cannabis Receptors & Food. The longer-the-better brewing time for white tea didn’t surprise me, but this did: Cold-Steeping Green Tea. Another way to maximize the phytonutrient absorption in tea is to eat it; see Is Matcha Good for You? and A Better Breakfast. One can overdo it, though: Overdosing on Tea. Other ways to protect one’s DNA include eating broccoli (see DNA Protection from Broccoli); avoiding bacon (see Carcinogens in the Smell of Frying Bacon); not overdoing stevia (see Is Stevia Good For You?); and eating a plant-based diet (see Repairing DNA Damage and Research Into Reversing Aging).  

Isn’t caffeinated tea dehydrating, though? That’s the topic of my next video; see Is Caffeinated Tea Dehydrating? 

For further context, check out my associated blog posts: Is Caffeinated Tea Really Dehydrating?; Ergothioneine: A New Vitamin?; Why Less Breast Cancer in Asia?; and Foods That May Block Cancer Formation.

If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.

Video anterior

Dead Meat Bacteria Endotoxemia

Siguiente video

Is Caffeinated Tea Dehydrating?

respuestas a

Deja un Comentario
Comment Etiquette

On NutritionFacts.org, you'll find a vibrant community of nutrition enthusiasts, health professionals, and many knowledgeable users seeking to discover the healthiest diet to eat for themselves and their families. As always, our goal is to foster conversations that are insightful, engaging, and most of all, helpful – from the nutrition beginners to the experts in our community.

To do this we need your help, so here are some basic guidelines to get you started.

The Short List

To help maintain and foster a welcoming atmosphere in our comments, please refrain from rude comments, name-calling, and responding to posts that break the rules (see our full Community Guidelines for more details). We will remove any posts in violation of our rules when we see it, which will, unfortunately, include any nicer comments that may have been made in response.

Be respectful and help out our staff and volunteer health supporters by actively not replying to comments that are breaking the rules. Instead, please flag or report them by submitting a ticket to our help desk. NutritionFacts.org is made up of an incredible staff and many dedicated volunteers that work hard to ensure that the comments section runs smoothly and we spend a great deal of time reading comments from our community members.

Have a correction or suggestion for video or blog? Please contact us to let us know. Submitting a correction this way will result in a quicker fix than commenting on a thread with a suggestion or correction.

View the Full Community Guidelines

Deja una respuesta

Tu correo electrónico no se publicará Los campos obligatorios están marcados *

Pin It en Pinterest

Share This