Any update on the scary in vitro avocado data?


any updates on avocados in vivo?

Toxins  / Originally Posted in Are Avocados Bad for You?


I’m happy to report that a new study this year found avocado consumption associated with significantly reduced prostate cancer risk (a third cup of avocado a day or more associated with 60% decreased odds of prostate cancer compared to men eating less than a daily tablespoon). Holy guacamole!

image credit: Muffet/ liz west / Wikimedia Commons

  • Stephen Lucker Kelly

    Good news. Been avoiding it completely. Good to know I can use it to thicken up some of my salads. :-)

  • Stephen Lucker Kelly

    I was thinking. The original video you did said that avocado acted like chemo. So it would indeed reduce cancer… but would it not also compromise your immune system. The study said it prevented prostate cancer but did it do this by damaging the immune system like was said in the original video?

    I mean does this study prove that it is not a danger in other immune system problems, and other cancers?

    • mbglife

      Same here. I remember the video saying that it in-vitro tests showed it blew DNA to pieces. I’d love to start eating it again, especially since I’m at increased risk of prostate cancer.

      • Omar Guerrero

        It was because they used the leaves and they have a toxin humans do not cosume th leaves.

        • Christopher

          leaves AND fruit were cited, both causing the same results.

  • Entropymm

    Does anyone have any idea why “men with high linolenic acid proportions were at increased likelihood of PCa?” As an omega-3 fatty acid, isn’t linolenic acid a good thing?

    • mbglife

      The “Results” section of the abstract at the “study” link above states: “high linolenic acid proportions were at increased likelihood of PCa [prostate cancer]”. But there are two forms of linolenic acid, a-linolenic which is n-3 (omega 3) and y-linolenic which is n-6 (omega 6). So, wouldn’t it make a difference which subtype is associated. Given the typical American diet, which is low in n-3 and too high in n-6, I’m wondering if these results don’t need further differentiation. But I’m posing this more as a question than an answer. I know very little about this, and I have your same a question, but the n-3, n-6 might be part of it.

  • Alexbf

    Ok ! But i am confuse should we eat or not ?!?!

  • Emma

    Ho did it go? Are there any more studies suggesting avocados are bad for us, or and research proving them to be fine to eat? DNA… All the best!

  • Angela

    Okay, well that addresses the cancer aspect, but what about during pregnancy? You’ve noted elsewhere pregnant women ought to avoid avocados. I’ve been doing the exact opposite!

    • dogulas

      How’d that turn out? ;)

  • Merrycherb1

    Since I have added a 1/2 avacodo to my smoothies my skin has cleared up and I am
    getting complaments that my skin looks much better.

  • Merrycherb1

    I have also started to loosing weight as I am comsuming more healthy fats

  • Elysia Green

    I’m still confused on this – Dr Greger what conclusion have you come to on this for now please?

  • David

    Just a thought….great news/much appreciated. Would help to have a date associated with the update.

  • David
  • mka0141

    Reading this is 2015…is the present conclusion that avocados may damage healthy dna in vitro, but so far no negative side effects have actually been reported in humans (only positive effects)?

  • Liselle

    How do they know it’s the persin, and not some pesticide in the avocado that’s causing DNA damage? Also, who eats avocado leaves? Why test them?

  • marko13

    whey protein vs pea protein vs cancer…per says “A new study shows whey protein may play a role in prostate cancer prevention.” but T Colin Campbell says dairy protein (casein) is more carcinogenic than the worst known carcionogen ( “…declaring that casein is a carcinogen that was far more powerful than aflatoxin (“the most potent carcinogen ever discovered”…)”
    Do you believe Campbell’s claim? Do you believe the study saying whey is good? If whey is bad, would pea protein have the same anti-cancer benefits without being dairy derived? Or is it specifically whey protein that fights cancer? Thanks for any clarity you can provide.

    • Joseph Gonzales R.D.

      I think any food isolate or concentrate is unnecessary. Whole foods are preferred. Oncology populations can differ, as survivors may not be able to eat by mouth or need additional nutrients to supplement their diet. That’s where I see the potential benefit of some of these protein powders, but I am not sure whey is the best choice? Some studies suggest whey and leucine-rich foods (meat and milk) stimulate the TOR pathway, which Dr. Greger addresses in this video. Whey protein is a highly concentrated source of animal protein, which may stimulate IGF-1 production. Similarly, concentrated/isolated soy protein supplements can also increase IGF-I. It may be that the ratio of animal to plant protein intake is important, too. Dr. Greger says in this video “Teens exposed to dairy proteins, for example, casein, skim milk, or whey experienced a significant increase in BMI and waist circumference compared to controls, whereas not a single study funded by the dairy industry found a result unfavorable to milk”

      Lastly, in a paper I wrote about cancer prevention, Applying the Precautionary Principle to Nutrition and Cancer I reference a study pointed out to me by Dr. David Jenkins about the overabundance of amino acids (Reference 46). If interested in reading more here’s a bunch of studies on whey and cancer.