Image Credit: eric forsberg / Flickr. This image has been modified.

Is Liquid Smoke Safe?

We know smoke inhalation isn’t good for us, but what about smoke ingestion? Decades ago, smoke flavorings were tested to see if they caused DNA mutations in bacteria—the tests came up negative. Even as more and more smoke flavoring was added, the DNA mutation rate remained about the same.

But the fact that something is not mutagenic in bacteria may have little predictive value for its effect on human cells. A group at MIT tested a hickory smoke flavoring they bought at the store against two types of human white blood cells. Unlike the bacteria, the mutation rate shot up as more and more liquid smoke was added. But, “there is no evidence that mutagenic activity in a particular human cell line is more closely related to human health risk than is mutagenic activity in bacteria.” In other words: just because liquid smoke causes DNA mutations to human cells in a petri dish, doesn’t mean that it does the same thing within the human body.

A good approach may be to just analyze liquid smoke for known carcinogens, chemicals that we know cause cancer.

Damaging DNA is just one of many ways chemicals can be toxic to cells. A decade later researchers tested to see what effect liquid smoke had on overall cell viability. If you drip water on cells, nothing happens, they keep powering away at around 100% survival, but drip on more and more wood fire smoke, and you start killing some of the cells off. Cigarette smoke is more toxic, but three out of four of the brands of liquid smoke they bought at the supermarket killed off even more cells, leading them to conclude that the cytotoxic potential of some commercial smoke flavorings is greater than that of liquid cigarette smoke, a finding they no doubt celebrated given that the researchers were paid employees of the R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Unfortunately they didn’t name names of the offending brands. That’s one of the reasons I was so excited about a new study, where they tested—and named–15 different brands of liquid smoke. This maximum “response” they were measuring was p53 activation.

P53 is a protein we make that binds to our DNA, you can see this illustrated in my video, Is Liquid Smoke Flavoring Carcinogenic?. It activates our DNA repair enzymes. So a big p53 response may be indicative of a lot of DNA damage,and a few of the liquid smoke flavorings activated p53 almost as much as a chemotherapy drug like etoposide, whose whole purpose is to break DNA strands.

Other flavorings didn’t seem as bad, though there was a hickory smoke powder that ranked pretty high, as did the fish sauce, though smoked paprika didn’t register at all.

The p53-activating property in liquid smoke was eliminated by standard baking conditions (350°F for 1h), so if you’re baking something with liquid smoke for long enough, it should eliminate this effect, though just boiling—even for an hour, or slow cooking doesn’t appear to work.

They conclude “If the DNA-damaging activities of liquid smoke were thought to be deleterious, it might be possible to replace liquid smoke with other safer, smoky substances.” Why do they say if thought to be deleterious? That’s because they’re not really measuring DNA damage, they’re measuring p53 activation, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.

P53 is considered “Guardian of our Genome,” guardian of our DNA. It’s considered a tumor suppressor gene, so if something boosts its activity is that good or bad? It’s like the broccoli story. Cruciferous vegetables dramatically boost our liver’s detoxifying enzymes. Is this because our body sees broccoli as toxic and is trying to get rid of it quicker? Either way, the end result is good, lower cancer risk.

It’s a biological phenomenon known as hormesis – that which doesn’t kill us may make us stronger. Like exercise is a stress on the body, but in the right amount can make us healthier in the long run. So, for example, teas and coffees caused p53 activation as well, but their consumption is associated with lower cancer risk. So it’s hard to know what to make of this p53 data. Due to the limitations of the available tests it’s hard to calculate the genotoxic potential of liquid smoke, or any other food for that matter. A better approach may be to just analyze liquid smoke for known carcinogens, chemicals that we know cause cancer.

This was first attempted back in 1971. One of the seven liquid smoke flavors researchers tested contained one polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon known to be cancer-causing, but there’s a bunch of similar carcinogens researchers didn’t test for. A later study, however, tested across the board, looking specifically at five different carcinogens in retail liquid smoke seasonings.

The recommended daily upper safety limit for these carcinogens is 47. Hickory smoke flavoring has only 0.8 per teaspoon, so we’d have to drink three bottles a day to bump up against the limit. And mesquite liquid smoke has only 1.1.

It turns out that most of the carcinogens in smoke are fat soluble, so when we make a water-based solution, like liquid smoke, we capture the smoke flavor compounds without capturing most of the smoke cancer compounds. The only time we need to really worry is when eating smoked foods—foods directly exposed to actual smoke. For example, smoked ham has 21.3 per serving, and smoked turkey breast has 26.7 per serving. One sandwich and we may be halfway to the limit, and one serving of barbequed chicken takes us over the top. Eating less than a single drumstick and we nearly double our daily allotment of these carcinogens. Nothing, however, is as bad as fish. Smoked herring? 140 per serving. And smoked salmon? One bagel with lox could take us ten times over the limit.

I’ve touched on those cooked meat carcinogens before. In Estrogenic Cooked Meat Carcinogens I explored the role of these cooked meat chemicals in tumor growth. PhIP: The Three Strikes Breast Carcinogen explored their role in cancer invasion. Reducing Cancer Risk In Meateaters offered some mediation strategies. Heterocyclic Amines in Eggs, Cheese, and Creatine? showed how even vegetarians may be at risk and Cancer, Interrupted: Green Tea and Cancer, Interrupted: Garlic & Flavonoids explored some counter measures.

Some smoke compounds may be a concern even if we don’t eat them. See Meat Fumes: Dietary Secondhand Smoke. Even the smell of frying bacon may be carcinogenic: Carcinogens in the Smell of Frying Bacon.

Some plant foods exposed to high temperatures may also present a concern. See Is Yerba Mate Tea Bad for You? and Acrylamide in French Fries. What about Carcinogens in Roasted Coffee?

The broccoli liver enzyme boost story is covered in The Best Detox.

-Michael Greger, M.D.

PS: If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here and watch my full 2012 – 2015 presentations Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death, More than an Apple a Day, From Table to Able, and Food as Medicine.


Michael Greger M.D., FACLM

Michael Greger, M.D. FACLM, is a physician, New York Times bestselling author, and internationally recognized professional speaker on a number of important public health issues. Dr. Greger has lectured at the Conference on World Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, and the International Bird Flu Summit, testified before Congress, appeared on The Dr. Oz Show and The Colbert Report, and was invited as an expert witness in defense of Oprah Winfrey at the infamous "meat defamation" trial.

27 responses to “Is Liquid Smoke Safe?

Comment Etiquette

On, you'll find a vibrant community of nutrition enthusiasts, health professionals, and many knowledgeable users seeking to discover the healthiest diet to eat for themselves and their families. As always, our goal is to foster conversations that are insightful, engaging, and most of all, helpful – from the nutrition beginners to the experts in our community.

To do this we need your help, so here are some basic guidelines to get you started.

The Short List

To help maintain and foster a welcoming atmosphere in our comments, please refrain from rude comments, name-calling, and responding to posts that break the rules (see our full Community Guidelines for more details). We will remove any posts in violation of our rules when we see it, which will, unfortunately, include any nicer comments that may have been made in response.

Be respectful and help out our staff and volunteer health supporters by actively not replying to comments that are breaking the rules. Instead, please flag or report them by submitting a ticket to our help desk. is made up of an incredible staff and many dedicated volunteers that work hard to ensure that the comments section runs smoothly and we spend a great deal of time reading comments from our community members.

Have a correction or suggestion for video or blog? Please contact us to let us know. Submitting a correction this way will result in a quicker fix than commenting on a thread with a suggestion or correction.

View the Full Community Guidelines

    1. This statement is in todays article. Talking about P53.

      Other flavorings didn’t seem as bad, though there was a hickory smoke powder that ranked pretty high, as did the fish sauce, though smoked paprika didn’t register at all.

    2. “Other flavorings didn’t seem as bad, though there was a hickory smoke powder that ranked pretty high, as did the fish sauce, though smoked paprika didn’t register at all.”

  1. Oh oh.. Is adding 1/2 – 1 tsp of liquid smoke flavoring into my cashew cheese or coconut bacon going to increase my chances of cancer? :-(

    1. Hi Ravi K. It wouldn’t appear so seems how liquid smoke has only 0.8 per teaspoon of carcinogens and the upper safety limit is 47.

  2. So, if grilled meats carry carcinogens, do grilled vegetables pick them up too? Or does grilled food only absorb the carcinogens when it has a high fat content? So meat, or perhaps vegetables coated in oil would, but vegetables without oil wouldn’t?

    1. Hi Jess. Meat contains creatine and sugar, which combined form heterocyclic amines – potentially mutagenic/carcinogenic compounds. Since veggies and plants lack creatine they do not form these dangerous compounds. Veggies on the grill can pick up polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), however, you are thinking right as more PAHs stem from fat dripping onto the grill, so perhaps less fat would yield less PAHs if grilling vegetables. One thing is for certain the smoked meats appear the most dangerous.

  3. We Indians are fond of smoked brinjal bharta ( the inner of roasted brinjal) . What is your opinion regarding health?

    1. Hi Dr. Agarwal. I couldn’t find anything on that product. I think if large doses of veggies are eaten with spices like liquid smoke or others the benefit of eating the whole foods outweigh any potential negative associations with the spices. In general, herbs and spices are bursting with antioxidants! If I find out more about this spice I’ll post it. Thanks!

      1. What about actually smoking brinjal (eggplant) as opposed to using liquid smoke? I have a stovetop smoker and occasionally smoke nuts, tomatoes, apples, eggplant, tofu, etc. (Stovetop smokers use higher temperatures and shorter cooking times than traditional outdoor charcoal smokers. They’re ideal for vegans (smoking plant-based foods) but for omnivores needing to break down collagen like in traditional BBQ meats.) I’ve tried using liquid smoke but it never tastes right. While the food I prepare in a stovetop smoker is smokey, the smoke flavor is more subtle than when prepared with liquid smoke. Any idea if smoking plant-based foods is as bad as meat? And if there’s a difference in this regard between smoking in a stovetop smoker and a traditional outdoor charcoal smoker?

        1. It would not be as bad as meat because smoking and heating meat forms carcinogens like HCAs unlike plants simply because plants do not have the creatine (amino acid) and muscle tissue needed to make HCAs. There could be some PAHs, but I don’t think what you are taking about would be super harmful. I’m not sure about different cookers, but we do know that time matters for cooked meats. Longer and hotter = more carcinogens formed.

  4. Hi Dr. Greger and Joe, I have a question that has been bothering me. I was wondering about your opinions on Mikoyo’s Creamery’s Smoked Farmhouse cheese. It’s a fermented nut cheese made from cashews, miso and nutritional yeast and unlike many other vegan products that use liquid smoke, it is actually smoked. Since it is high in fat, do you think it would contain carcinogens like bacon? I can’t find any studies on smoked nuts and carcinogens that might have similar implications for cancer or overall health. Thanks so much!

  5. Thanks a lot for sharing this, Dr. Greger. I’ve been vegetarian since January 2012 and have been very quickly transitioning to vegan over the past year. I tried a delicious smoked teriyaki seitan dish at one of the vegan Asian restaurants near me the other day and it had me wondering about liquid smoke, something I’ve seen in recipes I have yet to make. Figured this would be a great place to get some info.

  6. Hi :) very interesting article, thank you very much !

    One question to clarify …

    so adding liquid smoke collected by water. is always going to be healthier than any smoked meat.

    Any clues for labeling reading for newbies ? what to avoid what to look for ?


  7. Worrying about this stuff is futile unless you eat smoked food for every single meal every single day. The article gets it wrong when it says carcinogens cause cancer, as if they do 100% of the time. Carcinogen exposure does not result in cancer even close to 50% of the time. What you meant to say is that the carcinogens in naturally smoked foods *could*, *may*, or even *might* cause cancer, but it’s no guarantee. Eat what you like and try to keep a balanced diet. Reading scare articles will do nothing for your health except make you worry and that’s stress, something that’s bad for you guessed it! Your health. I’ll trade the 7 minutes of lifespan for a pulled pork sandwich that isn’t made with liquid smoke.

  8. Hi i wondered if fish sauce is then unhealthy and why?and how about bacon? Im still confused whether to still occasionally eat rotisserie chicken, occasionally broil fish for few mins, occasionally eat bacon, occasionaly liquid smoke in my bbq sauce etc because isnt even pan frying meat and bbq un healthy for the same reasons?what gas mark level sshould we not use to pan fry meat and eggs?or are eggs exempt? i usually use medium high medium etc and to sear meat like steak even bit higher but not often.but it says risks are correlated to prostate and im a woman..confused still

  9. Bacon is a class I carcinogen just like cigarettes, plutonium and asbestos. Fish sauce is extremely high in sodium (see Dr. G’s vids on sodium). Dr. G has many vids on the well know risk of early death of those that consume fish, chicken, bacon and other animal products. Simply put in the item of your choice in the search bar. Many vids will pop up. You’re consuming some of the most toxic life shortening poisons known when you eat these “foods” that you listed, but it’s up to you what you eat.

    1. There’s also the cured vs uncured factor to consider with meats. Sodium nitrite–used in “cured” meats–can produce nitrosamines when combined with other foods. For example, a cured hot dog and a beer produces nitrosamines, a known carcinogen.

      So, if you’re eating smoked, cured meats like deli meats, bacon, ham, Subway sandwiches, you’re getting a double whammy. It always best to eat uncured meat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This