How Much Exercise Is Too Much?

Republish

How much exercise is too much? There doesn’t appear to be any studies on the longevity of marathon or triathalon runners, but this study in which more than a thousand joggers were followed for up to a dozen years is able to offer some insight.

Surprisingly, the “light” joggers appeared to have the lowest mortality rates. Moderate joggers had a worse mortality rate than light joggers. They still did better than that of sedentary nonjoggers, but strenuous joggers did not. There wasn’t a significant difference in death rates between those jogging more than 4 hours a week and those not jogging at all. So the death versus jogging intensity graph was a U-shaped curve, with the lowest mortality bottoming out among those taking it relatively easy, clocking 1 to 2.4 hours a week over no more than three days at a slow or average pace. So more may not necessarily be better.

The jogging study spurred sensationalist headlines like “Fast Running Can Kill,” but the strenuous joggers were just dying at a higher rate compared to light joggers, not compared to the general population of nonjoggers. Here’s what a meta-analysis found of all such similar studies. Yes diminishing returns but the only clear mortality bump was associated with inactivity. However there was a retrospective analysis of more than a thousand male Olympic track and field athletes that suggested that those who had

extraordinary early peak performance had lifespans shortened by almost 5 years. The regimen for peak performance may not be the same as that for optimum health and longevity. Perhaps the mantra “exercise is medicine” metaphor should be taken a step further, recognizing that like any powerful medicine there may be a safe range of dosing.

Motion graphics by Avo Media

How much exercise is too much? There doesn’t appear to be any studies on the longevity of marathon or triathalon runners, but this study in which more than a thousand joggers were followed for up to a dozen years is able to offer some insight.

Surprisingly, the “light” joggers appeared to have the lowest mortality rates. Moderate joggers had a worse mortality rate than light joggers. They still did better than that of sedentary nonjoggers, but strenuous joggers did not. There wasn’t a significant difference in death rates between those jogging more than 4 hours a week and those not jogging at all. So the death versus jogging intensity graph was a U-shaped curve, with the lowest mortality bottoming out among those taking it relatively easy, clocking 1 to 2.4 hours a week over no more than three days at a slow or average pace. So more may not necessarily be better.

The jogging study spurred sensationalist headlines like “Fast Running Can Kill,” but the strenuous joggers were just dying at a higher rate compared to light joggers, not compared to the general population of nonjoggers. Here’s what a meta-analysis found of all such similar studies. Yes diminishing returns but the only clear mortality bump was associated with inactivity. However there was a retrospective analysis of more than a thousand male Olympic track and field athletes that suggested that those who had

extraordinary early peak performance had lifespans shortened by almost 5 years. The regimen for peak performance may not be the same as that for optimum health and longevity. Perhaps the mantra “exercise is medicine” metaphor should be taken a step further, recognizing that like any powerful medicine there may be a safe range of dosing.

Motion graphics by Avo Media

Doctor's Note

I hope you’re enjoying How Not to Age and the additional information we’ve provided so you have access to all of the science at your fingertips. See our entire video library covering a wide range of topics by visiting our videos page, and subscribe to our email list to receive our monthly newsletter and your choice of video and blog updates.

Pin It on Pinterest