Hair Testing for Mercury before Considering Pregnancy

Michael Greger M.D. FACLM · May 28, 2012 · Volume 9

5/5 - (9 votes)

The EPA safety limit on mercury in fish may not sufficiently protect pregnant women in the United States. This has led to a recommendation that fish-eating women get tested for mercury before considering getting pregnant.

Discuss

Transcript

Because, as editorialized in the Journal of Pediatrics last year, “Almost all fish contain some mercury,” women who plan on getting pregnant may want to first get tested for mercury. “Due to the considerable uncertainty,” they showed that “specific guidelines for number of servings of fish, which are ‘safe for women of reproductive age,’ may not be sufficiently specific to practically prevent fetal risk.” So, they conclude: “Analysis of hair mercury may be warranted before pregnancy” in women who eat a lot of fish. It’s a simple test. All they need is a hair sample, because mercury contaminates your whole body when you eat it.

The reason they’re so concerned is because they found that “even at the number of [fish] servings recommended by the FDA [as safe], there were women with hair mercury [levels] above the LOAEL [lowest observable adverse effect level] of 0.3…”

And some question the federal safety limits. A recent review from researchers at Harvard and elsewhere on the adverse effects of methylmercury notes that the U.S. EPA limit suggests an adult should be exposed to no more than 50 micrograms. But if that’s the case, then seafood better contain less than 0.1 per gram, and “current regulations in the United States and the European Union allow up to 10 times as much” mercury in fish as the EPA limit allows.

And they go on to criticize the EPA safety limit as being way too high itself. They argue that “Thus, (based on new data), the exposure limits estimated by the U.S. EPA [and international bodies] would need to be halved.”

So, our fish is allowed to have 20 times more mercury than may be considered safe.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Serena Mylchreest.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Sources

Acknowledgements

Topics

Because, as editorialized in the Journal of Pediatrics last year, “Almost all fish contain some mercury,” women who plan on getting pregnant may want to first get tested for mercury. “Due to the considerable uncertainty,” they showed that “specific guidelines for number of servings of fish, which are ‘safe for women of reproductive age,’ may not be sufficiently specific to practically prevent fetal risk.” So, they conclude: “Analysis of hair mercury may be warranted before pregnancy” in women who eat a lot of fish. It’s a simple test. All they need is a hair sample, because mercury contaminates your whole body when you eat it.

The reason they’re so concerned is because they found that “even at the number of [fish] servings recommended by the FDA [as safe], there were women with hair mercury [levels] above the LOAEL [lowest observable adverse effect level] of 0.3…”

And some question the federal safety limits. A recent review from researchers at Harvard and elsewhere on the adverse effects of methylmercury notes that the U.S. EPA limit suggests an adult should be exposed to no more than 50 micrograms. But if that’s the case, then seafood better contain less than 0.1 per gram, and “current regulations in the United States and the European Union allow up to 10 times as much” mercury in fish as the EPA limit allows.

And they go on to criticize the EPA safety limit as being way too high itself. They argue that “Thus, (based on new data), the exposure limits estimated by the U.S. EPA [and international bodies] would need to be halved.”

So, our fish is allowed to have 20 times more mercury than may be considered safe.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Serena Mylchreest.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Doctor's Note

There is so much more mercury in fish compared to other foods that it can be used as a biomarker for fish consumption: see Hair Testing for Mercury. How much mercury exposure is there from fish, as compared to amalgam fillings and vaccinations? See Amalgam Fillings vs. Canned Tuna, and Mercury in Vaccinations vs. Tuna. Fish aren’t the only source of toxic heavy metals, though. Mercury has been found in both high fructose corn syrup-containing products (see Mercury in Corn Syrup?), and Ayervedic dietary supplements (Get the Lead Out). I also have videos on Aluminum in Vaccines vs. Food, and Arsenic in Chicken.

For additional context, check out my associated blog posts: Mercury Testing Recommended Before Pregnancy; Head Shrinking from Grilling Meat; and Fukushima Radiation and Seafood.

If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here. Read our important information about translations here.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This