Does Sunscreen Cause or Prevent Skin Cancer?

Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.

Decades ago, studies started bubbling up, reporting that not only was the use of sunscreen not found to be protective against skin cancer, but it was associated with significantly elevated risk. But subsequent studies offered the obvious explanation of this paradox. People who use sunscreen are more likely to be sunbathers. That’s like finding that those who use motorcycle helmets are more likely to die on the highway. It’s not that sunscreen and helmets aren’t protective; it’s just that they are associated with engagement in risky activities. But you don’t know, until you put it to the test.

As I noted in my last video, randomized controlled trials have shown that regular use of sunscreen can arrest visible signs of skin aging, including biopsy-proven reductions in UV-related skin damage. But are there interventional trials proving sunscreen can prevent cancer? Yes.

Organ transplant recipients are highly susceptible to skin cancers because they have to be given immune suppressants to prevent organ rejection. A group of 120 organ recipients were equally informed about sun protection measures, but half were given free, broad spectrum SPF 50+ sunscreen for daily application to their head, neck, forearms, and hands. After two years, there were nine new basal carcinomas in the control group, versus only two in the sunscreen group. That sounds good, but it may have just been a fluke. In contrast, there was a highly significant difference in the proportion of patients who got new invasive squamous cell carcinomas. Eight new cases in the control group, versus zero in the sunscreen group. But wait until you hear about what happened to their actinic keratoses, the precancerous growths that can turn into skin cancer.

They all started out covered in them; a total of 191 detected in each group. In the subsequent 24 months, the control group developed 82 new ones. How many did the sunscreen group develop? Negative 102. More than 100 precancerous growths in the sunscreen group spontaneously regressed and vanished completely (compared to 82 new growths developing in the control group without a single one disappearing). Their bodies, even in their immunocompromised state, could heal itself once it just stopped being bombarded with so many cancer-causing rays.

Other randomized controlled trials have shown similar findings, but generalizability is limited. The studies all used high-risk populations––for example, those living in subtropical climates, or with a personal history of precancerous lesions. So, cancer prevention efficacy in the general population would be expected to be less. On the other hand, the studies could have also underestimated the impact, since they were relatively short-term (not exceeding four years), and ethically had to allow control group participants to slather on their own sunscreen, which would dilute the difference between groups.

For maximum effectiveness, sunscreen needs to be applied properly, which apparently rarely happens in the real world. In a study of nearly 5,000 skiers and snowboarders, almost no one, only about 4 percent, were fully compliant with sunscreen recommendations. First, there’s the amount. The FDA standard is two milligrams per square centimeter. What does that mean? Use the teaspoon rule: one teaspoon for your face, one for your head and neck, one for the front of your torso, another for your back, one teaspoon for each arm and two teaspoons for each leg. That’s a total of nine teaspoons. That’s about the total volume equivalent of a golf ball or shot glass, to help you visualize it.

Unfortunately, the average sunscreen user may only apply a quarter of the recommended amount. This is why high SPF sunscreens are often recommended, like 50+ SPF. Although the FDA recommends a minimum SPF of only 15 to prevent skin cancer, under normal consumer conditions, even an SPF of 50 may effectively give you only an SPF of 12.5, because most people don’t put on enough. Randomized double-blind, head-to-head, split-face experiments, where you are randomized to apply one sunscreen on one side of your face, and another sunscreen to the other side, show that in real life use, SPF 100+ sunscreen works significantly better than SPF 50+ sunscreen. More than 50 percent of the participants were sunburned more on their SPF 50+ side, compared to only about 5 percent on their SPF 100+ side.

Now, a potential downside of higher SPF sunscreens is that they could provide a false sense of security. Those randomized to an SPF 30 sunscreen ended up spending more cumulative time in the sun than those receiving an SPF 10 sunscreen––as much as five times longer in some cases.

What else? Well, people tend to remember to use sunscreen on a sunny day at the beach. But sun protection is needed even on cloudy days, since the UV rays are not dampened as much as visible light. There’s even a phenomenon known as “cloud enhancement” where overcast skies can sometimes result in even more UV reaching the Earth’s surface compared to clear skies.

Sunscreen labels often suggest waiting at least 15 minutes after application before going outdoors, but when put to the test, sunscreen was found to start working immediately, with the full effect apparent by minute ten. However, if water resistance is required, it may be prudent to wait the full 15 to 30 minutes after application before taking a dip. The terms “waterproof” or “sweatproof” appear to be meaningless marketing, as no difference in retention was noted between “waterproof” products and those merely labeled “water-resistant.” Both were better than non-water-resistant products, though, which lost nearly all their protective effects within 20 minutes of water immersion.

The suggestion that sunscreen should be reapplied every two to three hours only applies under conditions in which it is rinsed off by water or sweat, or rubbed off by friction from clothing or sand. Even after allowing sunscreen to dry first for 20 minutes, between 15 to 60 percent of its protective effect can be lost after contact with sand. Otherwise, if the recommended amount is applied and the sunscreen layer is not disturbed, SPF can be maintained for as long as eight hours.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

• Westerdahl J, Olsson H, Måsbäck A, Ingvar C, Jonsson N. Is the use of sunscreens a risk factor for malignant melanoma? Melanoma Res. 1995;5(1):59-65.
• Westerdahl J, Ingvar C, Mâsbäck A, Olsson H. Sunscreen use and malignant melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;87(1):145-150.
• Li H, Colantonio S, Dawson A, Lin X, Beecker J. Sunscreen application, safety, and sun protection: the evidence. J Cutan Med Surg. 2019;23(4):357-369.
• Phillips TJ, Bhawan J, Yaar M, Bello Y, Lopiccolo D, Nash JF. Effect of daily versus intermittent sunscreen application on solar simulated UV radiation-induced skin response in humans. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(4):610-618.
• Ulrich C, Jürgensen JS, Degen A, et al. Prevention of non-melanoma skin cancer in organ transplant patients by regular use of a sunscreen: a 24 months, prospective, case-control study. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161 Suppl 3:78-84.
• Waldman RA, Grant-Kels JM. The role of sunscreen in the prevention of cutaneous melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(2):574-576.e1.
• Ramos-e-Silva M, Celem LR, Ramos-e-Silva S, Fucci-da-Costa AP. Anti-aging cosmetics: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31(6):750-758.
• Buller DB, Andersen PA, Walkosz BJ, et al. Compliance with sunscreen advice in a survey of adults engaged in outdoor winter recreation at high-elevation ski areas. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(1):63-70.
• Isedeh P, Osterwalder U, Lim HW. Teaspoon rule revisited: proper amount of sunscreen application. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2013;29(1):55-56.
• Krutmann J, Berking C, Berneburg M, Diepgen TL, Dirschka T, Szeimies M. New strategies in the prevention of actinic keratosis: a critical review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;28(6):281-289.
• Williams JD, Maitra P, Atillasoy E, Wu MM, Farberg AS, Rigel DS. SPF 100+ sunscreen is more protective against sunburn than SPF 50+ in actual use: Results of a randomized, double-blind, split-face, natural sunlight exposure clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(5):902-910.e2.
• Autier P, Doré JF, Négrier S, et al. Sunscreen use and duration of sun exposure: a double-blind, randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91(15):1304-1309.
• Strauss DG, Michele TM. Skin cancer prevention and sunscreen safety: commentary on american society of clinical oncology policy statement on skin cancer prevention. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(8):436-438.
• Calbó J, Pagès D, González JA. Empirical studies of cloud effects on uv radiation: a review: cloud effects on uv radiation. Rev Geophys. 2005;43(2).
• Guidance for Industry Labeling and Effectiveness Testing: Sunscreen Drug Products for OverThe-Counter Human Use — Small Entity Compliance Guide. HHS, FDA, CDER. Dec 2012.
• de Gálvez MV, Aguilera J, Buendía EA, Sánchez-Roldán C, Herrera-Ceballos E. Time required for a standard sunscreen to become effective following application: a UV photography study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(4):e123-e124.
• Stokes RP, Diffey BL. The water resistance of sunscreen and day-care products. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(2):259-263.
• Stokes RP, Diffey BL. A novel ex vivo technique to assess the sand/rub resistance of sunscreen products. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2000;22(5):329-334.
• Sander M, Sander M, Burbidge T, Beecker J. The efficacy and safety of sunscreen use for the prevention of skin cancer. CMAJ. 2020;192(50):E1802-E1808.

Motion graphics by Avo Media

• cancer
• FDA
• skin cancer
• skin health
• sunscreen
• wrinkles