The big fat “fat gene” accounts for less than 1% of the differences in size between people.
The Role of Genes in the Obesity Epidemic
4.8/5 - (71 votes)
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
To date, about 100 genetic markers have been linked to obesity. But put all of them together and overall, they account for less than 3 percent of the difference in BMI between people. The “fat gene” you may have heard about (called FTO, short for “FaT mass and Obesity associated’’) is the gene most strongly linked to obesity, but it explains less than 1 percent of the difference between people––a mere 0.34 percent.
FTO codes for a brain protein that appears to affect your appetite. Are you one of the billion people that carry the FTO susceptibility genes? Who cares, as it only appears to result in a difference in intake of a few hundred extra calories a year. The energy imbalance that led to the obesity epidemic is on the order of hundreds of calories a day. And that’s the gene so far known to have the most effect. The chances of accurately predicting obesity risk based on FTO status is only slightly better than flipping a coin. In other words, no; those genes don’t make you look fat.
When it comes to obesity, the power of your genes is nothing compared to the power of your fork. Even the small influence the FTO gene has appears to be weaker among those who are physically active, and may be abolished completely in those eating healthier diets. FTO only appears to affect those eating diets higher in saturated fat (predominantly found in meat, dairy, and junk food). Those eating healthier appear to be at no greater risk of weight gain––even if they inherited the “fat gene” from both their parents.
Physiologically, FTO gene status does not appear to affect your ability to lose weight. Psychologically, knowing you’re at increased genetic risk for obesity may motivate some people to eat and live healthier, but may cause others to fatalistically throw their hands up in the air and resign themselves to thinking that it just runs in their family. Obesity does tend to run in families, but so do lousy diets.
Comparing the weight of biological versus adopted children can help tease out the contributions of lifestyles versus genetics. Children growing up with two overweight biological parents were found to be 27 percent more likely to be overweight themselves, whereas adopted children placed in a home with two overweight parents were 21 percent more likely to be overweight. So, genetics plays a role, but this suggests that it’s more the children’s environment than their DNA.
One of the most dramatic examples of the power of diet over DNA comes from the Pima Indians. The Pima Indians of Arizona have among the highest rates of obesity and the highest rates of diabetes in the world. This has been ascribed to their relatively fuel-efficient genetic makeup. Their propensity to store calories may have served them well in times of scarcity when they were living off of corn, beans, and squash. But, when the area became “settled”, their source of water, the Gila river, was diverted upstream. Those who survived the ensuing famine had to abandon their traditional diet to living off of government food programs, and chronic disease rates skyrocketed. Same genes, but different diet, different result.
In fact, a natural experiment was set up. The Pima living over the border in Mexico come from the same genetic pool, but were able to maintain more of their traditional lifestyle––sticking with their beans, tortillas, and potatoes. Same genes, but seven times less obesity, and about four times less diabetes. Genes may load the gun, but diet pulls the trigger.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518(7538):197-206.
- Loos RJ, Yeo GS. The bigger picture of FTO: the first GWAS-identified obesity gene. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(1):51-61.
- Karra E, O’Daly OG, Choudhury AI, et al. A link between FTO, ghrelin, and impaired brain food-cue responsivity. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3539-51.
- Cheung MK, Yeo GS. FTO biology and obesity: why do a billion of us weigh 3 kg more? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2011;2:4.
- Tedstone AE. Obesity treatment—are personalised approaches missing the point? BMJ. 2016;354:i4980.
- Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):826-37.
- Kilpeläinen TO, Qi L, Brage S, et al. Physical activity attenuates the influence of FTO variants on obesity risk: a meta-analysis of 218,166 adults and 19,268 children. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001116.
- Corella D, Arnett DK, Tucker KL, et al. A high intake of saturated fatty acids strengthens the association between the fat mass and obesity-associated gene and BMI. J Nutr. 2011;141(12):2219-25.
- Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Papandonatos GD, et al. FTO genotype and weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis of 9563 individual participant data from eight randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2016;354:i4707.
- Celis-Morales C, Marsaux CF, Livingstone KM, et al. Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(5):1204-13.
- Meisel SF, Walker C, Wardle J. Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(3):540-6.
- Kmietowicz Z. Nurture is more important than nature in childhood obesity, study finds. BMJ. 2015;350:h817.
- Centre for Economic Performance. Vertical transmission of overweight: evidence from English adoptees. Published October 2016. Available at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1324.pdf. Accessed March 19, 2019.
- Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, et al. Obesity in the Pima Indians: its magnitude and relationship with diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53(6 Suppl):1543S-51S.
- Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, Bennett PH. Diabetes mellitus in the Pima Indians: incidence, risk factors and pathogenesis. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1990;6(1):1-27.
- Ravussin E. Energy metabolism in obesity. Studies in the Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(1):232-8.
- Boyce VL, Swinburn BA. The traditional Pima Indian diet. Composition and adaptation for use in a dietary intervention study. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(1):369-71.
- Schulz LO, Bennett PH, Ravussin E, et al. Effects of traditional and western environments on prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians in Mexico and the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1866-71.
Video production by Glass Entertainment
Motion graphics by Avocado Video
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
To date, about 100 genetic markers have been linked to obesity. But put all of them together and overall, they account for less than 3 percent of the difference in BMI between people. The “fat gene” you may have heard about (called FTO, short for “FaT mass and Obesity associated’’) is the gene most strongly linked to obesity, but it explains less than 1 percent of the difference between people––a mere 0.34 percent.
FTO codes for a brain protein that appears to affect your appetite. Are you one of the billion people that carry the FTO susceptibility genes? Who cares, as it only appears to result in a difference in intake of a few hundred extra calories a year. The energy imbalance that led to the obesity epidemic is on the order of hundreds of calories a day. And that’s the gene so far known to have the most effect. The chances of accurately predicting obesity risk based on FTO status is only slightly better than flipping a coin. In other words, no; those genes don’t make you look fat.
When it comes to obesity, the power of your genes is nothing compared to the power of your fork. Even the small influence the FTO gene has appears to be weaker among those who are physically active, and may be abolished completely in those eating healthier diets. FTO only appears to affect those eating diets higher in saturated fat (predominantly found in meat, dairy, and junk food). Those eating healthier appear to be at no greater risk of weight gain––even if they inherited the “fat gene” from both their parents.
Physiologically, FTO gene status does not appear to affect your ability to lose weight. Psychologically, knowing you’re at increased genetic risk for obesity may motivate some people to eat and live healthier, but may cause others to fatalistically throw their hands up in the air and resign themselves to thinking that it just runs in their family. Obesity does tend to run in families, but so do lousy diets.
Comparing the weight of biological versus adopted children can help tease out the contributions of lifestyles versus genetics. Children growing up with two overweight biological parents were found to be 27 percent more likely to be overweight themselves, whereas adopted children placed in a home with two overweight parents were 21 percent more likely to be overweight. So, genetics plays a role, but this suggests that it’s more the children’s environment than their DNA.
One of the most dramatic examples of the power of diet over DNA comes from the Pima Indians. The Pima Indians of Arizona have among the highest rates of obesity and the highest rates of diabetes in the world. This has been ascribed to their relatively fuel-efficient genetic makeup. Their propensity to store calories may have served them well in times of scarcity when they were living off of corn, beans, and squash. But, when the area became “settled”, their source of water, the Gila river, was diverted upstream. Those who survived the ensuing famine had to abandon their traditional diet to living off of government food programs, and chronic disease rates skyrocketed. Same genes, but different diet, different result.
In fact, a natural experiment was set up. The Pima living over the border in Mexico come from the same genetic pool, but were able to maintain more of their traditional lifestyle––sticking with their beans, tortillas, and potatoes. Same genes, but seven times less obesity, and about four times less diabetes. Genes may load the gun, but diet pulls the trigger.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature. 2015;518(7538):197-206.
- Loos RJ, Yeo GS. The bigger picture of FTO: the first GWAS-identified obesity gene. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(1):51-61.
- Karra E, O’Daly OG, Choudhury AI, et al. A link between FTO, ghrelin, and impaired brain food-cue responsivity. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3539-51.
- Cheung MK, Yeo GS. FTO biology and obesity: why do a billion of us weigh 3 kg more? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2011;2:4.
- Tedstone AE. Obesity treatment—are personalised approaches missing the point? BMJ. 2016;354:i4980.
- Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):826-37.
- Kilpeläinen TO, Qi L, Brage S, et al. Physical activity attenuates the influence of FTO variants on obesity risk: a meta-analysis of 218,166 adults and 19,268 children. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001116.
- Corella D, Arnett DK, Tucker KL, et al. A high intake of saturated fatty acids strengthens the association between the fat mass and obesity-associated gene and BMI. J Nutr. 2011;141(12):2219-25.
- Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Papandonatos GD, et al. FTO genotype and weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis of 9563 individual participant data from eight randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2016;354:i4707.
- Celis-Morales C, Marsaux CF, Livingstone KM, et al. Can genetic-based advice help you lose weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(5):1204-13.
- Meisel SF, Walker C, Wardle J. Psychological responses to genetic testing for weight gain: a vignette study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(3):540-6.
- Kmietowicz Z. Nurture is more important than nature in childhood obesity, study finds. BMJ. 2015;350:h817.
- Centre for Economic Performance. Vertical transmission of overweight: evidence from English adoptees. Published October 2016. Available at: http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1324.pdf. Accessed March 19, 2019.
- Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, et al. Obesity in the Pima Indians: its magnitude and relationship with diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53(6 Suppl):1543S-51S.
- Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Saad MF, Bennett PH. Diabetes mellitus in the Pima Indians: incidence, risk factors and pathogenesis. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1990;6(1):1-27.
- Ravussin E. Energy metabolism in obesity. Studies in the Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(1):232-8.
- Boyce VL, Swinburn BA. The traditional Pima Indian diet. Composition and adaptation for use in a dietary intervention study. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(1):369-71.
- Schulz LO, Bennett PH, Ravussin E, et al. Effects of traditional and western environments on prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Pima Indians in Mexico and the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(8):1866-71.
Video production by Glass Entertainment
Motion graphics by Avocado Video
Republishing "The Role of Genes in the Obesity Epidemic"
Terms
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
Title
The Role of Genes in the Obesity Epidemic
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
Of course it’s not our genes! Our genes didn’t suddenly change 40 years ago. At the same time, though, in a certain sense, it could be thought of as all in our genes. That’s the topic of my next video The Thrifty Gene Theory: Survival of the Fattest
This is the second in an 11-part video series on the obesity epidemic. If you missed the first one, check out The Role of Diet vs. Exercise in the Obesity Epidemic.
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to our free newsletter. With your subscription, you'll also get notifications for just-released blogs and videos. Check out our information page about our translated resources.
Previous Video
Next Video
