A review of the best available science examining the impact of eating frequency on both weight and health.
To Snack or Not to Snack?, 4.6 out of 5 based on 5 ratings
To snack or not to snack, a review was recently published on the accumulated research about eating frequency and both weight and health. Maybe we should eat throughout the day to reduce hunger, increase our metabolic rate, mobilize our body fat, or… maybe, snacking will just lead us to overeat. What, does the science say?—what do you think? A few big meals a day or smaller more frequent meals throughout the day for weight management and optimal health?
According to the best available science? It… doesn’t matter. “Overall current evidence does not suggest that manipulating eating frequency greatly benefits weight and health.” What we eat is more important than how often we eat it.
If you do like snacking, though, a new study thanks to the California Prune Board suggests that—what else—prunes may be a particularly good choice given the “satiating power of prunes, which they found—like with nuts, to compensate for the majority of their calories.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Kerry Skinner.
To help out on the site please email firstname.lastname@example.org
That was a quickie! This is not the first time we've run across the Prune Board. Remember their appearance in Dietary Guidelines: With a Grain of Big Salt? For a comparison of dried fruits, see Dried Apples Versus Cholesterol (the graphic of which sneaks into the intro of Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death) and Better Than Goji Berries. Nuts are also super healthy snacks. See Fighting Inflammation in a Nut Shell, What Women Should Eat to Live Longer, and Nuts and Bolts of Cholesterol Lowering.
Please check out my associated blog post for more context: The Anti-Wrinkle Diet
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.