Cancer-Proofing Mutation

Cancer-Proofing Mutation
4 (80%) 1 vote

Congenital IGF-1 deficiency can lead to Laron Syndrome (a type of dwarfism); but with such low growth hormone levels, those with the condition have dramatically lower cancer rates. This raises the question of whether one can achieve the best of both worlds—by ensuring adequate IGF-1 levels during childhood, while then suppressing excess growth promotion in adulthood.

Discuss
Republish

You may have seen this recent New York Times story about a rare genetic defect that leads to a type of dwarfism—that’s IGF-1 deficiency. Their growth factor levels are so low they only grow this tall, but they almost never get cancer. Here’s the IGF-1 levels in their nonaffected relatives, compared to those with the condition. Now, let’s look at their respective cancer rates. About 20% of their relatives died of cancer, which is pretty standard. And the percentage of those with IGF-1 deficiency dying of cancer? Zero. Not a single person in the study.

Here’s what nonaffected family members die of—the usual; heart disease, cancer, stroke. The folks with IGF-1 deficiency may die of a lot of things—they actually get hit by cars more; were recorded tripping down stairs. So, 20%, death from accidents, but they never died of cancer.

So, scientists began thinking, why not have the best of both worlds? Have all the growth factor you need as a kid, to grow to a normal height; but then, as soon as you attain a normal adult stature, keep your IGF-1 levels low. Keep your cell life-and-death balance sheets balanced. And we can do that, through dietary manipulation, which I will cover tomorrow.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Kerry Skinner.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Image thanks to Valter Longo

 

You may have seen this recent New York Times story about a rare genetic defect that leads to a type of dwarfism—that’s IGF-1 deficiency. Their growth factor levels are so low they only grow this tall, but they almost never get cancer. Here’s the IGF-1 levels in their nonaffected relatives, compared to those with the condition. Now, let’s look at their respective cancer rates. About 20% of their relatives died of cancer, which is pretty standard. And the percentage of those with IGF-1 deficiency dying of cancer? Zero. Not a single person in the study.

Here’s what nonaffected family members die of—the usual; heart disease, cancer, stroke. The folks with IGF-1 deficiency may die of a lot of things—they actually get hit by cars more; were recorded tripping down stairs. So, 20%, death from accidents, but they never died of cancer.

So, scientists began thinking, why not have the best of both worlds? Have all the growth factor you need as a kid, to grow to a normal height; but then, as soon as you attain a normal adult stature, keep your IGF-1 levels low. Keep your cell life-and-death balance sheets balanced. And we can do that, through dietary manipulation, which I will cover tomorrow.

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Kerry Skinner.

Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.

Image thanks to Valter Longo

 

Doctor's Note

For background on the cancer-promoting effects on IGF-1, be sure to check out IGF-1 as One-Stop Cancer Shop. Next, I’ll unveil The Answer to the Pritikin Puzzle, for those who missed the spoiler alert in Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death. What puzzle? See Ex Vivo Cancer Proliferation Bioassay and Prostate vs. a Plant-Based Diet.

For more context, check out my associated blog posts:  Eating To Extend Our LifespanHow Do Plant-Based Diets Fight Cancer? and Why Are Children Starting Puberty Earlier?

If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.

34 responses to “Cancer-Proofing Mutation

Commenting Etiquette

The intention of the comment section under each video and blog post is to allow all members to share their stories, questions, and feedback with others in a welcoming, engaging, and respectful environment. Off-topic comments are permitted, in hopes more experienced users may be able to point them to more relevant videos that may answer their questions. Vigorous debate of science is welcome so long as participants can disagree respectfully. Advertising products or services is not permitted.

To make NutritionFacts.org a place where people feel comfortable posting without feeling attacked, we have no tolerance for ad hominem attacks or comments that are racist, misogynist, homophobic, vulgar, or otherwise inappropriate. Please help us to foster a community of mutual respect. Enforcement of these rules is done to the best of our ability on a case-by-case basis.

  1. For background on the cancer promoting effects on IGF-1 make sure to check out yesterday’s video-of-the-day IGF-1 as One-Stop Cancer Shop. Tomorrow I unveil The Answer to the Pritikin Puzzle, for those who missed the spoiler alert in Uprooting the Leading Causes of Death. What puzzle? See Developing an Ex Vivo Cancer Proliferation Bioassay and Prostate Versus a Plant-Based Diet.

    Then, if you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here.




    0



    0
  2. Interesting sentence (from the Discussion section, paragraph 2) of the source article (Guevara-Aguirre et al.):

    “The lack of lifespan extension in GHRD subjects may be explained in large part by the major proportion of deaths (70%) caused by convulsive disorders, alcohol toxicity, accidents, liver cirrhosis and other non-age-related causes.”

    GHRD refers to the Growth Hormone Receptor Deficiency subjects who were the experimental group in the study that Dr. Greger is describing. They are not just deficient in IGF-1, but also growth hormone receptor (GHR).




    0



    0
    1.  About 24 seconds into the video, Dr. Greger reports that these little folks have an insignificant amount of  the hormone itself, especially compared to their relatives, not just defective receptors- which they also have. But why do you suppose these folks die from convulsive disorders so often? I noticed that they live in Ecuador;  where cocaine is easily available. Could it be that their little bodies can’t handle cocaine as well- if that’s the cause? I think that having smaller livers must be what explains their alcohol toxicity.




      0



      0
        1.  Thanks BPCveg, it could be, but I’m not sure this article is saying that. Seems to me it’s blaming the treatment drug,  ‘post provocation’  valproate for reducing HGH and IGF-1, instead of saying that epilepsy and low IGF-1 are commodities. ‘Course, I could be reading it wrong and it is interesting that the treatment group had higher BMI’s, something common with the little guys who have Laron’s. If you find anything more specific, please let us all know. I’m sure you’re much more informed about this stuff than I am. I just thought that if they’re inclined in their culture to drink to excess, resulting in death, the same could easily be true of cocaine misuse, which can cause convulsive disorders. I also want everyone to understand that I don’t want to appear to be critical of the little guys; if I am, I’m afraid that they may come and bite my kneecap.




          0



          0
          1. Hi Doug:  Sorry for sending the wrong article; I agree it doesn’t quite convey what I tried to suggest.

            I did a few more searches on the subject (wikipedia, google scholar, etc) and it turns out that those who suffer from Laron Syndrome (the type of dwarfism described in this video) frequently have chronic low blood sugar levels (hypoglycemia) and that this low blood sugar can lead to shortage of brain blood sugar (Neuroglycopenia), which is associated with loss of conciousness, damage to the brain, seizures etc. I guess that this may explain why those with Laron’s syndrome suffer from more “convulsive disorders” and more accidents. What do you think?




            0



            0
            1. Interesting. Can low IGF-1 and/or high hgh (because that’s the case for Larons) be linked to chronic low blood sugar? And if so, what is the mechanism?




              0



              0
  3. I would like to know the average life span of these people.I remember learning that people with Drawfism live a shorter time.  If you live a signifaclly shorted time you have less time for the cancer in your body to grow.




    0



    0
  4. Blaming IGF-1 for cancer sounds legitimate, but how can you explain people like Steve Jobs, who are lifelong vegans, getting and dying from cancer? His own body produced too much?  I read Dr. McDougall’s article on Steve Jobs, but the issue of why cancer was able to thrive in his body despite his vegan diet was never fully addressed.




    0



    0
    1. Jobs was overweight for some time. Who knows what he ate behind closed doors exactly? I’d say processed foods helped to keep him that way and could also have negative effects.




      0



      0
      1. That’s a possibility.  Though he abstained from eating animal products, he may have eaten a lot of fried and processed foods;  that’s a big ‘maybe’ though.  Even with that being said, Dr. Greger is saying that people switching to a vegan diet maintain lower levels of IGF-1 and produce blood that is “inhospitable to cancer.”  Even if he was exposed to high levels of carcinogens, cancer shouldn’t have been able to thrive in his body as it did.  That’s the part that I find troubling.




        0



        0
    2. I think with Steve Jobs it was more a case of exposure to carcinogenic substances early in his career, and less related to excess IGF-1. I read Dr. McDougall’s excellent article as well. Heavy-duty chemical carcinogens may have, unfortunately in this case, trumped Steve’s veganism. 




      0



      0
    3. As Mike and Carl point out, there are lots of factors in life besides diet that contribute to risk, though diet is certainly one of the most important ones.  You can also always find exceptions to rules, like the guy who smokes two packs a day and drinks like a fish but lives to be 104.  It is extremely uncommon, but it happens.  Likewise, you can find the person who does everything right and still gets a horrible disease.  But statistically speaking, those examples are so rare as to be relatively insignificant – they don’t prove much of anything.  What is much more common is for people who take good care of themselves to live longer, healthier, more functional lives in general, and for those who don’t take care of themselves to run into debilitating problems prematurely, or death.  It’s not 0% vs. 100% probability, it’s always somewhere in between.  All we can do is just work to improve our chances, even though there are never guarantees.




      0



      0
      1. From what I understand, he only began eating fish near the end of his life.  The cancer grew slowly over the course of a couple decades, during which time, he was vegan.  At least that’s what I’ve read.




        0



        0
    4. Who knows what his vegan diet consisted of. Perhaps he included many refined products, or perhaps he exposed his body to many carcinogens. There are a number of possible nutritional factors. “Vegan” only means no animal products. Oreos, chips and white bread is all vegan.




      0



      0
      1. A vegan does not equate to health either. White breads, candy, french fries, mock meats and the like are all vegan yet considered unhealthy foods. Ideally we want to consume whole, unrefined plant foods.




        0



        0
        1. Precisely, “vegan diet” is a concept, it’s execution in practice is what makes the difference. Even farm fresh organic veggies could have heavy metals like arsenic, a potent carcinogen especially common is the Australian and New Zealand soil. Cooking methods matter, Dr Greger pointed that raw vegan diets are more susceptible to vitamin and mineral deficiencies, cooking method also matter (i.e. frying is vegan), burnt food (i.e. burnt carrots) is carcinogenic…




          0



          0
  5. Here’s a link to a Scientific American article (published Feb 2011) covering Laron’s syndrome (the type of dwarfism discussed in this video):

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=defective-growth-gene-in-dwarfism

    The article makes essentially the same argument as Dr. Greger – first noting that those with Laron’s have virtually zero cancer rate and then noting that “greater protein intake and higher IGF1 levels contribute to the increasing cancer incidence”.

    Astonishingly, near the end of the article quotes one of the researchers stating:

    “people shouldn’t make up their own diets to try to extend their life. If you don’t have a clear disclaimer, you will be amazed at what people do.”




    0



    0
  6. A plant-based diet can lower IGF-1 levels, but how do the lower levels post diet/exercise compare to people with Laron’s syndrome or people in the lower risk group in the meta-analyses shown in the video?




    0



    0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This