The role wet markets, wildlife trafficking, and pangolins have played in the emergence of SARS-CoV-2.
Where Did the COVID-19 Coronavirus Come From?
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
A review published in the December 2019 issue of the journal Infectious Disease Clinics of North America concluded: “The SARS epidemic demonstrated that novel highly pathogenic viruses crossing the animal-human barrier remain a major threat to global health security.” Little did the authors know that by the date of publication, just such a virus was brewing. “[I]t will not be surprising if new coronaviruses emerge in the near future,” read another review a few months before. “[I]t is highly likely that future SARS- or MERS-like coronavirus outbreaks will originate from bats, and there is an increased probability that this will occur in China.” These warnings are not new, dating back more than a decade. “The presence of a large reservoir of SARS-like coronaviruses in… bats, together with the culture of eating exotic mammals in southern China, is a time bomb.” A time bomb that just went off.
Now I hope you can understand how Dr. Li’s “7 SARS cases confirmed …” forewarning was so ominous. That’s why I did the last video about SARS, because it gives some context. It wasn’t the SARS coronavirus he found, though (the cause of SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome), but instead a virus that would come to be known as SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of COVID-19, short for coronavirus disease 2019. Before it became known as SARS-CoV-2, though, it was just the “Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus.”
According to the director of the Chinese CDC, ground zero for the COVID-19 pandemic was the Hua’nan Market in Wuhan, China, where most of the first human cases could be traced back. Described as the largest wholesale seafood market in Central China, the Hua’nan Market reportedly also sold 75 species of wild animals. If you want to see what that part of the market looked like, you can go to bit.ly/HuananMarket, but I’m not going to show the photos because some may find them disturbing.
Although there are fish coronaviruses, 90 percent of the samples that turned up positive for the virus were found in the section of the half-million square-foot seafood market where those photos were taken—the part that trafficked in exotic animals sold for food.
The fact that the genetic sequences of the viruses obtained from some of the early human victims were 99.9 percent identical, despite the rapid mutation rate of coronaviruses, suggests the current pandemic originated within a very short period from a single source. Although there have been documented reports of the original SARS coronavirus escaping from laboratories, the fact that the COVID-19 coronavirus was optimized for binding to human cells in a novel way suggests that the new pandemic we now face was not made in some laboratory but rather natural means, though to lock in the necessary mutations the “animal host would probably have to have a high population density.”
The new coronavirus appears to share a common ancestor with the original SARS virus, for which it is about 80 percent identical, but it’s more than 95 percent identical with a coronavirus found in a bat in 2013. The current thinking is that the COVID-19 virus originated in bats, but then jumped to humans only after passing through an intermediate host. The pandemic emerged in winter, after all, when most bat species in Wuhan are hibernating, and no bats were reportedly found at the Hua’nan Market. There were labs in the proximity of the market where bat viruses might have escaped, but the virus was found in environmental samples taken directly from the market. Unfortunately, the market was closed and cleared before the animals themselves were tested, complicating the forensic search for the source. In the case of SARS, the intermediate host between bats and human-to-human transmission was the civet; in MERS it was camels. What was the intermediate host for COVID-19? The leading candidate for the stepping-stone civet of the current outbreak is the pangolin.
Also known as scaly anteaters, pangolins look like a cross between a sloth and a pinecone. But between the demand for their meat as a delicacy and their scales for use in traditional Chinese medicine, pangolins are the most trafficked mammal in the world.
Coronaviruses from two separate batches of diseased pangolins being smuggled into China were found to be about 90 percent identical with the COVID-19 virus. Not only is the pangolin the only other mammal found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2-like viruses, but the critical receptor-binding region of the pangolin coronavirus spike protein is virtually identical to the human strain. Work is still underway, but whichever the animal was, that one meal, that one medicine, may have ended costing humanity a few trillion dollars and a few million lives.
Given the role exotic animal trafficking appears to have played in the current global health crisis, some in the international scientific community have called for a ban on the sale of wild animals and a closure of live animal markets. Even infectious disease experts within Wuhan started calling for “completely eradicating wildlife trading.”
On January 26, 2020, the Chinese government responded, announcing a total ban on the trade and sale of wild animal meat, reportedly shutting down or quarantining almost twenty thousand wildlife farms across seven Chinese provinces, though the ban is only set to be temporary. After the SARS outbreak in 2003, Chinese officials enacted a similar ban on the trade of civet cats, but within months the ban was lifted, and the animals were back on the menu.
Much of the wildlife trade was already illegal in China in the first place, with flaunted bans dating back more than a decade. The Chinese pangolin, for example, is officially considered a critically endangered species.
That’s part of the draw, though, as a serving of “extra rare” meat may project prestige and wealth. A thriving black market already exists, and it could potentially be driven further underground by government action. “The ultimate solution,” wrote a group of Chinese scientists, “lies in changing people’s minds about what is delicious, trendy, prestigious, or healthy to eat.” Having spent the bulk of my professional life trying to get people to eat more healthfully to prevent chronic disease, I can certainly relate.
Even in the unlikely event the current ban was to be made permanent and was enforced effectively, there remains a glaring loophole: The ban exempts the use of wild animals for traditional Chinese medicine. So, while it’s currently illegal to eat pangolin meat, it’s not illegal to eat other pangolin parts. How ironic that the pandemic appears to have arisen in a market selling remedies purported to promote immunity and longevity. Pangolin blood is said to “promote…circulation.”
For only about $30 a pound, anyone can go online and buy Chinese bat feces to treat their eye disorders. While the drying of excrement would presumably inactivate coronavirus, the trade and handling of live and recently killed bats for use in traditional remedies could infect people directly, or certainly introduce opportunities for cross-infection with susceptible hosts.
Now it is easy for xenophobic Westerners to condemn cultures consuming rhino horns, tiger bones, and pangolin scales, or 21st century manifestations such as mukbangs (livestreaming broadcasts of people eating bat soup and the like). But, as I discuss in my new book How to Survive a Pandemic (all proceeds I receive for which are donated to charity), the last pandemic, the 2009 H1N1 swine flu virus, arose not from some backwater wet market in Asia, but rather was largely made-in-the-USA from industrial pig operations in the United States. So, for the emergence of SARS-CoV-3, we may need look no further than our own plates.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Hui DSC, Zumla A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Historical, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Features. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(4):869-89.
- Hemida MG. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus and the One Health concept. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7556.
- Fan Y, Zhao K, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Bat Coronaviruses in China. Viruses. 2019;11(3).
- Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):660-94.
- Green A. Li Wenliang. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):682.
- The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(4):536-44.
- Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199-1207.
- Malik YS, Sircar S, Bhat S, et al. Emerging novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-current scenario, evolutionary perspective based on genome analysis and recent developments. Vet Q. 2020;40(1):68-76.
- Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-74.
- Lim PL, Kurup A, Gopalakrishna G, et al. Laboratory-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(17):1740-5.
- Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020;26:450-2.
- Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270-3.
- Xiao B, Xiao L. The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. 2020.
- Zhang YZ, Holmes EC. A Genomic Perspective on the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020;181(2):223-7.
- Lam TT, Shum MH, Zhu H, et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature. 2020.
- Docea AO, Tsatsakis A, Albulescu D, et al. A new threat from an old enemy: Re‑emergence of coronavirus (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2020;45(6):1631-43.
- Zhang T, Wu Q, Zhang Z. Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak. Curr Biol. 2020;30(7):1346-51.
- Liu P, Chen W, Chen JP. Viral Metagenomics Revealed Sendai Virus and Coronavirus Infection of Malayan Pangolins. Viruses. 2019;11(11):979.
- Lam TT, Shum MH, Zhu HC, et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature. 2020.
- Yang Y, Peng F, Wang R, et al. The deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102434.
- Li JY, You Z, Wang Q, et al. The epidemic of 2019-novel-coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia and insights for emerging infectious diseases in the future. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):80-5.
- Harypursat V, Chen YK. Six weeks into the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak- it is time to consider strategies to impede the emergence of new zoonotic infections. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1118-20.
- China bans sale of wildlife following coronavirus. Vet Rec. 2020;186(5):144-5.
- Normile D, Yimin D. Infectious diseases. Civets back on China's menu. Science. 2003;301(5636):1031.
- Zhou ZM, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW, Newman C. China: clamp down on violations of wildlife trade ban. Nature. 2020;578(7794):217.
- Li J, Li JJ, Xie X, et al. Game consumption and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):275-6.
- Fitzgerald GA. Misguided drug advice for COVID-19. Science. 2020;367(6485):1434.
- Smith GD, Ng F, Ho cheung li W. COVID-19: Emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9-10):1425-8.
- Wassenaar TM, Zou Y. 2019_nCoV/SARS-CoV-2: rapid classification of betacoronaviruses and identification of Traditional Chinese Medicine as potential origin of zoonotic coronaviruses. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2020;70(5):342-8.
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 - MeSH. NCBI.
- Ting TCC. China real estate news. China Business Network. Jan 22, 2020.
- Li PJ. First SARS, now the Wuhan coronavirus. Here’s why China should ban its wildlife trade forever. South China Morning Post. Jan 29, 2020.
- China Detects Large Quantity of Novel Coronavirus at Wuhan Seafood Market. Xinhua News. January 27, 2020.
- Standaert M. Coronavirus closures reveal vast scale of China’s secretive wildlife farm industry. The Guardian. Feb 24, 2020.
- Challender D, Wu S, Kaspal P, Khatiwada A, Ghose A, Ching-Min Sun N, Mohapatra RK, Laxmi Suwal L T. Manis pentadactyla (errata version published in 2020). The IUCN Red List of threatened species 2019. 2019. Cambridge (United Kingdom): International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
- Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol. 2020;dyaa033.
- Santoni D, Vergni D. In the search of potential epitopes for Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus using high order nullomers. J Immunol Methods. 2020;112787.
- Volpato G, Fontefrancesco MF, Gruppuso P, et al. Baby pangolins on my plate: possible lessons to learn from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine. 2020;16,19.
Motion graphics by AvoMedia
Image credit: Stephen Dickson via Wikimedia. Image has been modified.
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
A review published in the December 2019 issue of the journal Infectious Disease Clinics of North America concluded: “The SARS epidemic demonstrated that novel highly pathogenic viruses crossing the animal-human barrier remain a major threat to global health security.” Little did the authors know that by the date of publication, just such a virus was brewing. “[I]t will not be surprising if new coronaviruses emerge in the near future,” read another review a few months before. “[I]t is highly likely that future SARS- or MERS-like coronavirus outbreaks will originate from bats, and there is an increased probability that this will occur in China.” These warnings are not new, dating back more than a decade. “The presence of a large reservoir of SARS-like coronaviruses in… bats, together with the culture of eating exotic mammals in southern China, is a time bomb.” A time bomb that just went off.
Now I hope you can understand how Dr. Li’s “7 SARS cases confirmed …” forewarning was so ominous. That’s why I did the last video about SARS, because it gives some context. It wasn’t the SARS coronavirus he found, though (the cause of SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome), but instead a virus that would come to be known as SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of COVID-19, short for coronavirus disease 2019. Before it became known as SARS-CoV-2, though, it was just the “Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus.”
According to the director of the Chinese CDC, ground zero for the COVID-19 pandemic was the Hua’nan Market in Wuhan, China, where most of the first human cases could be traced back. Described as the largest wholesale seafood market in Central China, the Hua’nan Market reportedly also sold 75 species of wild animals. If you want to see what that part of the market looked like, you can go to bit.ly/HuananMarket, but I’m not going to show the photos because some may find them disturbing.
Although there are fish coronaviruses, 90 percent of the samples that turned up positive for the virus were found in the section of the half-million square-foot seafood market where those photos were taken—the part that trafficked in exotic animals sold for food.
The fact that the genetic sequences of the viruses obtained from some of the early human victims were 99.9 percent identical, despite the rapid mutation rate of coronaviruses, suggests the current pandemic originated within a very short period from a single source. Although there have been documented reports of the original SARS coronavirus escaping from laboratories, the fact that the COVID-19 coronavirus was optimized for binding to human cells in a novel way suggests that the new pandemic we now face was not made in some laboratory but rather natural means, though to lock in the necessary mutations the “animal host would probably have to have a high population density.”
The new coronavirus appears to share a common ancestor with the original SARS virus, for which it is about 80 percent identical, but it’s more than 95 percent identical with a coronavirus found in a bat in 2013. The current thinking is that the COVID-19 virus originated in bats, but then jumped to humans only after passing through an intermediate host. The pandemic emerged in winter, after all, when most bat species in Wuhan are hibernating, and no bats were reportedly found at the Hua’nan Market. There were labs in the proximity of the market where bat viruses might have escaped, but the virus was found in environmental samples taken directly from the market. Unfortunately, the market was closed and cleared before the animals themselves were tested, complicating the forensic search for the source. In the case of SARS, the intermediate host between bats and human-to-human transmission was the civet; in MERS it was camels. What was the intermediate host for COVID-19? The leading candidate for the stepping-stone civet of the current outbreak is the pangolin.
Also known as scaly anteaters, pangolins look like a cross between a sloth and a pinecone. But between the demand for their meat as a delicacy and their scales for use in traditional Chinese medicine, pangolins are the most trafficked mammal in the world.
Coronaviruses from two separate batches of diseased pangolins being smuggled into China were found to be about 90 percent identical with the COVID-19 virus. Not only is the pangolin the only other mammal found to be infected with SARS-CoV-2-like viruses, but the critical receptor-binding region of the pangolin coronavirus spike protein is virtually identical to the human strain. Work is still underway, but whichever the animal was, that one meal, that one medicine, may have ended costing humanity a few trillion dollars and a few million lives.
Given the role exotic animal trafficking appears to have played in the current global health crisis, some in the international scientific community have called for a ban on the sale of wild animals and a closure of live animal markets. Even infectious disease experts within Wuhan started calling for “completely eradicating wildlife trading.”
On January 26, 2020, the Chinese government responded, announcing a total ban on the trade and sale of wild animal meat, reportedly shutting down or quarantining almost twenty thousand wildlife farms across seven Chinese provinces, though the ban is only set to be temporary. After the SARS outbreak in 2003, Chinese officials enacted a similar ban on the trade of civet cats, but within months the ban was lifted, and the animals were back on the menu.
Much of the wildlife trade was already illegal in China in the first place, with flaunted bans dating back more than a decade. The Chinese pangolin, for example, is officially considered a critically endangered species.
That’s part of the draw, though, as a serving of “extra rare” meat may project prestige and wealth. A thriving black market already exists, and it could potentially be driven further underground by government action. “The ultimate solution,” wrote a group of Chinese scientists, “lies in changing people’s minds about what is delicious, trendy, prestigious, or healthy to eat.” Having spent the bulk of my professional life trying to get people to eat more healthfully to prevent chronic disease, I can certainly relate.
Even in the unlikely event the current ban was to be made permanent and was enforced effectively, there remains a glaring loophole: The ban exempts the use of wild animals for traditional Chinese medicine. So, while it’s currently illegal to eat pangolin meat, it’s not illegal to eat other pangolin parts. How ironic that the pandemic appears to have arisen in a market selling remedies purported to promote immunity and longevity. Pangolin blood is said to “promote…circulation.”
For only about $30 a pound, anyone can go online and buy Chinese bat feces to treat their eye disorders. While the drying of excrement would presumably inactivate coronavirus, the trade and handling of live and recently killed bats for use in traditional remedies could infect people directly, or certainly introduce opportunities for cross-infection with susceptible hosts.
Now it is easy for xenophobic Westerners to condemn cultures consuming rhino horns, tiger bones, and pangolin scales, or 21st century manifestations such as mukbangs (livestreaming broadcasts of people eating bat soup and the like). But, as I discuss in my new book How to Survive a Pandemic (all proceeds I receive for which are donated to charity), the last pandemic, the 2009 H1N1 swine flu virus, arose not from some backwater wet market in Asia, but rather was largely made-in-the-USA from industrial pig operations in the United States. So, for the emergence of SARS-CoV-3, we may need look no further than our own plates.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Hui DSC, Zumla A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: Historical, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Features. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(4):869-89.
- Hemida MG. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus and the One Health concept. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7556.
- Fan Y, Zhao K, Shi ZL, Zhou P. Bat Coronaviruses in China. Viruses. 2019;11(3).
- Cheng VC, Lau SK, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus as an agent of emerging and reemerging infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(4):660-94.
- Green A. Li Wenliang. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):682.
- The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(4):536-44.
- Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199-1207.
- Malik YS, Sircar S, Bhat S, et al. Emerging novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)-current scenario, evolutionary perspective based on genome analysis and recent developments. Vet Q. 2020;40(1):68-76.
- Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-74.
- Lim PL, Kurup A, Gopalakrishna G, et al. Laboratory-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(17):1740-5.
- Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020;26:450-2.
- Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579(7798):270-3.
- Xiao B, Xiao L. The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. 2020.
- Zhang YZ, Holmes EC. A Genomic Perspective on the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2020;181(2):223-7.
- Lam TT, Shum MH, Zhu H, et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature. 2020.
- Docea AO, Tsatsakis A, Albulescu D, et al. A new threat from an old enemy: Re‑emergence of coronavirus (Review). Int J Mol Med. 2020;45(6):1631-43.
- Zhang T, Wu Q, Zhang Z. Probable pangolin origin of SARS-CoV-2 associated with the COVID-19 outbreak. Curr Biol. 2020;30(7):1346-51.
- Liu P, Chen W, Chen JP. Viral Metagenomics Revealed Sendai Virus and Coronavirus Infection of Malayan Pangolins. Viruses. 2019;11(11):979.
- Lam TT, Shum MH, Zhu HC, et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature. 2020.
- Yang Y, Peng F, Wang R, et al. The deadly coronaviruses: The 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102434.
- Li JY, You Z, Wang Q, et al. The epidemic of 2019-novel-coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pneumonia and insights for emerging infectious diseases in the future. Microbes Infect. 2020;22(2):80-5.
- Harypursat V, Chen YK. Six weeks into the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak- it is time to consider strategies to impede the emergence of new zoonotic infections. Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1118-20.
- China bans sale of wildlife following coronavirus. Vet Rec. 2020;186(5):144-5.
- Normile D, Yimin D. Infectious diseases. Civets back on China's menu. Science. 2003;301(5636):1031.
- Zhou ZM, Buesching CD, Macdonald DW, Newman C. China: clamp down on violations of wildlife trade ban. Nature. 2020;578(7794):217.
- Li J, Li JJ, Xie X, et al. Game consumption and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(3):275-6.
- Fitzgerald GA. Misguided drug advice for COVID-19. Science. 2020;367(6485):1434.
- Smith GD, Ng F, Ho cheung li W. COVID-19: Emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9-10):1425-8.
- Wassenaar TM, Zou Y. 2019_nCoV/SARS-CoV-2: rapid classification of betacoronaviruses and identification of Traditional Chinese Medicine as potential origin of zoonotic coronaviruses. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2020;70(5):342-8.
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 - MeSH. NCBI.
- Ting TCC. China real estate news. China Business Network. Jan 22, 2020.
- Li PJ. First SARS, now the Wuhan coronavirus. Here’s why China should ban its wildlife trade forever. South China Morning Post. Jan 29, 2020.
- China Detects Large Quantity of Novel Coronavirus at Wuhan Seafood Market. Xinhua News. January 27, 2020.
- Standaert M. Coronavirus closures reveal vast scale of China’s secretive wildlife farm industry. The Guardian. Feb 24, 2020.
- Challender D, Wu S, Kaspal P, Khatiwada A, Ghose A, Ching-Min Sun N, Mohapatra RK, Laxmi Suwal L T. Manis pentadactyla (errata version published in 2020). The IUCN Red List of threatened species 2019. 2019. Cambridge (United Kingdom): International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
- Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol. 2020;dyaa033.
- Santoni D, Vergni D. In the search of potential epitopes for Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus using high order nullomers. J Immunol Methods. 2020;112787.
- Volpato G, Fontefrancesco MF, Gruppuso P, et al. Baby pangolins on my plate: possible lessons to learn from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Ethnobiology Ethnomedicine. 2020;16,19.
Motion graphics by AvoMedia
Image credit: Stephen Dickson via Wikimedia. Image has been modified.
Republishing "Where Did the COVID-19 Coronavirus Come From?"
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
Where Did the COVID-19 Coronavirus Come From?
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
If you’ve missed the first two videos in this series, check out Where Do Deadly Coronaviruses Like MERS-CoV Come From? and The SARS Coronavirus and Wet Markets.
Up next: The Last Coronavirus Pandemic May Have Been Caused by Livestock and R0 and Incubation Periods: How Other Coronavirus Outbreaks Were Stopped.
You can download the whole series (for free) right now here and take an even deeper dive in my new book How to Survive a Pandemic (note: all my proceeds from this book are donated to pandemic prevention charities).
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to our free newsletter. With your subscription, you'll also get notifications for just-released blogs and videos. Check out our information page about our translated resources.