One of the worst breakfast cereals will surprise you.
The Worst Food for Tooth Decay
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
Nearly a half century ago at a Senate hearing on nutrition, a Dr. Nizel from Tufts suggested that sugary breakfast cereals “should be banned in the best interest for all concerned, particularly children”—perhaps not surprisingly, since he was a professor of dental medicine.
A dozen different foods and beverages were ranked for their “cariogenic potential”—their cavity-causing potential—by implanting electrodes in the mouths of study subjects to measure the amount of acid produced in the plaque between their teeth after eating a variety of different things. And, the two breakfast cereals they tested topped the charts.
If you drink some sugar water, the pH on your teeth plunges within minutes into the acidic danger zone, and stays there for an hour, eating away at your teeth. Caramel is worse. It sticks to your teeth, so stays longer, down deeper in the acid zone. But, check out the breakfast cereals: goes down and stays down, even two hours later.
We’ve known about the cavity-causing “potential of presweetened breakfast cereals” for decades. A dozen such cereals were put to the test to measure the level of tooth-dissolving acid produced by the strain of bacteria that causes cavities. As one might expect, “the [cavity-generating] potential was found to be related directly to the sugar content of each cereal”—though Frosted Mini-Wheats was an exception. Despite having 40 percent less sugar than cereals like Froot Loops or Frosted Flakes, Frosted Mini-Wheats caused the greatest calcium demineralization—ranking second only to the now defunct “Powdered Donutz” in cavity-causing potential. A study of twenty-eight different cereals concluded that “Unquestionably, the sugar concentrations in these twenty-eight cereals are sufficiently high to qualify them as dentally dangerous.”
Wanting to be good corporate citizens, General Mills took their Super Sugar Crisp, which was 44 percent sugar, and reduced the sugar…font size. Then, caring about children’s health so much, they removed sugar altogether…from, the name….
Kellogg’s cares, too. Though Sugar Smacks is, apparently, where “space energy comes from,” it doesn’t sound as wholesome as Honey Smacks; same cereal, healthier name. They did remove sugar from Corn Pops and Frosted Flakes; I mean, well, from the front of the boxes.
And Cookie Crisp? I think the fact that it’s made by a dog food company says it all.
But, General Mills protests: a study they did in which teens were randomized to receive free cereal delivered to their homes—or not—didn’t seem to get any more cavities, proving breakfast cereal is harmless for your teeth. Anyone care to take a guess at the study’s fatal flaw? The kids in the control group were free to just have their parents buy their sugary cereals from the store, and so both the experimental and control groups may have been eating the same cereal, “with the only difference being that the experimental group received its cereal free, and the control group” had to pay for it.
What did the General Mills researchers have to say for themselves? “Dietary controls so rigid as to exclude the ingestion of cereals by children would be difficult, if not impossible.” But then, that’s not a control group!
That’s like this Kellogg’s-funded paper saying yeah, if we didn’t feed kids sugar, then we could virtually eliminate cavities, but “this ideal is impractical.” So, let’s take the middle ground and come up with, oh, Froot Loops with marshmallows. But hey, at least they’re fruit shaped, or at least “fruity shaped.”
Observational studies have also failed to link breakfast cereal consumption with cavity prevalence though, or incidence. This is presumed to be because eating it with milk helps clear food particles from the mouth. Though Frosted Mini-Wheats did lead to the same sugar retention in the saliva ten minutes after intake, with or without milk, the other cereals were cleared out faster. “[S]ugared cereals are often eaten as snacks [by kids, though] without milk.”
And, ten minutes after the ingestion of dry sugary cereals, you’re left with nearly 50 times the sugar residue in your mouth, compared to swishing the sugar down in liquid form. “[I]t is inconceivable,” concluded the researchers, “to contest the fact that frequent between-meal ingestion of [foods like high-sugar cereal] is dentally hazardous. Whether or not meal-time eating of sugared cereals induce [cavities] is not the point…because [kids snack on them] between meals, they have a marked potential for dental danger.”
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Minton KL, Berry CW. Cariogenic potential of presweetened breakfast cereals. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7(4):282-286.
- Gibson SA. Breakfast cereal consumption in young children: associations with non-milk extrinsic sugars and caries experience: further analysis of data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey of children aged 1.5-4.5 years. Public Health Nutr. 2000;3(2):227-232.
- Glass RL, Fleisch S. Diet and dental caries: dental caries incidence and the consumption of ready-to-eat cereals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88(4):807-813.
- Rowe NH, Anderson RH, Wanninger LA. Effects of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals on dental caries experience in adolescent children: a three-year study. J Dent Res. 1974;53(1):33-36.
- Mellion GL. Letter: Presweetened cereals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;89(4):767-768. 7
- Hearings Before the Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs of the United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session. Nutrition Education--1973. Parts 3, 4, and 5--TV Advertising of Food to Children. Washington, D.C., March 5, 6, and 12, 1973.
- Shannon IL, McCartney JC. Presweetened dry breakfast cereals: potential for dental danger. ASDC J Dent Child. 1981;48(3):215-218.
- Schachtele CF, Jensen ME. Can Foods be Ranked According to Their Cariogenic Potential? Cariology Today. Intl Congress in Honour of Professor Dr. H.R. Mühlemann, Zürich, September 1983. 1984;136-146.
- Holden C. Battle Heats Up over Sugared Cereals. Science. 1977;198(4320):902-903.
Image credits: Ajrieger via wikia, Wokandapix via pixabay, and Jason Liebig. Images have been modified.
Motion graphics by Avocado Video
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
Nearly a half century ago at a Senate hearing on nutrition, a Dr. Nizel from Tufts suggested that sugary breakfast cereals “should be banned in the best interest for all concerned, particularly children”—perhaps not surprisingly, since he was a professor of dental medicine.
A dozen different foods and beverages were ranked for their “cariogenic potential”—their cavity-causing potential—by implanting electrodes in the mouths of study subjects to measure the amount of acid produced in the plaque between their teeth after eating a variety of different things. And, the two breakfast cereals they tested topped the charts.
If you drink some sugar water, the pH on your teeth plunges within minutes into the acidic danger zone, and stays there for an hour, eating away at your teeth. Caramel is worse. It sticks to your teeth, so stays longer, down deeper in the acid zone. But, check out the breakfast cereals: goes down and stays down, even two hours later.
We’ve known about the cavity-causing “potential of presweetened breakfast cereals” for decades. A dozen such cereals were put to the test to measure the level of tooth-dissolving acid produced by the strain of bacteria that causes cavities. As one might expect, “the [cavity-generating] potential was found to be related directly to the sugar content of each cereal”—though Frosted Mini-Wheats was an exception. Despite having 40 percent less sugar than cereals like Froot Loops or Frosted Flakes, Frosted Mini-Wheats caused the greatest calcium demineralization—ranking second only to the now defunct “Powdered Donutz” in cavity-causing potential. A study of twenty-eight different cereals concluded that “Unquestionably, the sugar concentrations in these twenty-eight cereals are sufficiently high to qualify them as dentally dangerous.”
Wanting to be good corporate citizens, General Mills took their Super Sugar Crisp, which was 44 percent sugar, and reduced the sugar…font size. Then, caring about children’s health so much, they removed sugar altogether…from, the name….
Kellogg’s cares, too. Though Sugar Smacks is, apparently, where “space energy comes from,” it doesn’t sound as wholesome as Honey Smacks; same cereal, healthier name. They did remove sugar from Corn Pops and Frosted Flakes; I mean, well, from the front of the boxes.
And Cookie Crisp? I think the fact that it’s made by a dog food company says it all.
But, General Mills protests: a study they did in which teens were randomized to receive free cereal delivered to their homes—or not—didn’t seem to get any more cavities, proving breakfast cereal is harmless for your teeth. Anyone care to take a guess at the study’s fatal flaw? The kids in the control group were free to just have their parents buy their sugary cereals from the store, and so both the experimental and control groups may have been eating the same cereal, “with the only difference being that the experimental group received its cereal free, and the control group” had to pay for it.
What did the General Mills researchers have to say for themselves? “Dietary controls so rigid as to exclude the ingestion of cereals by children would be difficult, if not impossible.” But then, that’s not a control group!
That’s like this Kellogg’s-funded paper saying yeah, if we didn’t feed kids sugar, then we could virtually eliminate cavities, but “this ideal is impractical.” So, let’s take the middle ground and come up with, oh, Froot Loops with marshmallows. But hey, at least they’re fruit shaped, or at least “fruity shaped.”
Observational studies have also failed to link breakfast cereal consumption with cavity prevalence though, or incidence. This is presumed to be because eating it with milk helps clear food particles from the mouth. Though Frosted Mini-Wheats did lead to the same sugar retention in the saliva ten minutes after intake, with or without milk, the other cereals were cleared out faster. “[S]ugared cereals are often eaten as snacks [by kids, though] without milk.”
And, ten minutes after the ingestion of dry sugary cereals, you’re left with nearly 50 times the sugar residue in your mouth, compared to swishing the sugar down in liquid form. “[I]t is inconceivable,” concluded the researchers, “to contest the fact that frequent between-meal ingestion of [foods like high-sugar cereal] is dentally hazardous. Whether or not meal-time eating of sugared cereals induce [cavities] is not the point…because [kids snack on them] between meals, they have a marked potential for dental danger.”
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Minton KL, Berry CW. Cariogenic potential of presweetened breakfast cereals. Pediatr Dent. 1985;7(4):282-286.
- Gibson SA. Breakfast cereal consumption in young children: associations with non-milk extrinsic sugars and caries experience: further analysis of data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey of children aged 1.5-4.5 years. Public Health Nutr. 2000;3(2):227-232.
- Glass RL, Fleisch S. Diet and dental caries: dental caries incidence and the consumption of ready-to-eat cereals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88(4):807-813.
- Rowe NH, Anderson RH, Wanninger LA. Effects of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals on dental caries experience in adolescent children: a three-year study. J Dent Res. 1974;53(1):33-36.
- Mellion GL. Letter: Presweetened cereals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;89(4):767-768. 7
- Hearings Before the Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs of the United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, First Session. Nutrition Education--1973. Parts 3, 4, and 5--TV Advertising of Food to Children. Washington, D.C., March 5, 6, and 12, 1973.
- Shannon IL, McCartney JC. Presweetened dry breakfast cereals: potential for dental danger. ASDC J Dent Child. 1981;48(3):215-218.
- Schachtele CF, Jensen ME. Can Foods be Ranked According to Their Cariogenic Potential? Cariology Today. Intl Congress in Honour of Professor Dr. H.R. Mühlemann, Zürich, September 1983. 1984;136-146.
- Holden C. Battle Heats Up over Sugared Cereals. Science. 1977;198(4320):902-903.
Image credits: Ajrieger via wikia, Wokandapix via pixabay, and Jason Liebig. Images have been modified.
Motion graphics by Avocado Video
Republishing "The Worst Food for Tooth Decay"
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
The Worst Food for Tooth Decay
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
Which Is a Better Breakfast – Cereal or Oatmeal? Check out the video. And, check out this older video for how to make A Better Breakfast.
Studies like the one from General Mills are the reason it’s so important to look beyond the headlines, and it’s why I dedicate so much time to pointing out research flaws and red flags. The lesson is: always check the primary source—or, just let me do it for you!
My popular sugar videos are:
- If Fructose Is Bad, What About Fruit?
- How Much Fruit Is Too Much?
- How Much Added Sugar Is Too Much?
- Big Sugar Takes on the World Health Organization
- Does Diet Soda Increase Stroke Risk as Much as Regular Soda?
After this video came out, I put out more on cereal: Kids’ Breakfast Cereals as Nutritional Façade and Ochratoxin in Breakfast Cereals.
Citrus can also have an acidifying effect on teeth, so always rinse after consuming citrus: Plant-Based Diets: Dental Health. When it comes to caring for your teeth, Don’t Use Antiseptic Mouthwash. Instead, watch What’s the Best Mouthwash? for a better option. And Should You Floss Before or After Your Brush?
And, what about toothpaste? See:
- Antibacterial Toothpaste: Harmful, Helpful, or Harmless?
- Is Sodium Lauryl Sulfate Safe?
- Is CABP in SLS-Free Toothpaste Any Better?
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to our free newsletter. With your subscription, you'll also get notifications for just-released blogs and videos. Check out our information page about our translated resources.