How do you unlock the mysteries of aging?
There’s a Fly in My Aging Research!
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
There are numerous ways to try to unlock the mysteries of aging. You could study long-lived individuals like centenarians and supercentenarians, particularly long-lived smokers, perhaps, to uncover the secrets to their resilience. Or, you could go in the opposite direction and study short-lived people—tragic, accelerated aging syndromes like progeria, where children age at eight to ten times the normal rate––wrinkling, balding, and then typically dying around age 13 of a heart attack or stroke.
Or, you could study long-lived animals. There are mammals, such as the bowhead whale, that can live hundreds of years. There are oysters and clams whose hearts can beat more than a billion times over its five-century lifespan. What accounts for the 10,000-fold range of lifespan in the animal kingdom?
Most of the aging pathways identified as the hallmarks of aging were established using so-called “model organisms,” such as yeast, worms, flies, and mice—simpler species that may nonetheless offer insights, due to the remarkable conservation of common aging mechanisms throughout the eons of evolutionary time. Aging used to be considered simply too complex to study––a constellation of internal and external influences too complicated to disentangle. But then, the game changer, the discovery that a single gene mutation could dramatically prolong the lifespan and youthful state of a tiny worm known as C. elegans.
C. elegans has since wormed its way deep into the study of longevity. It seems we shared a common ancestor about a half billion years ago, and, to this day, we still share about half of their genes. With a lifespan of only two to three weeks, their fast turnover allows researchers to rapidly assess the effects of genetic or dietary tweaks, unlike humans, who are described as “not an easy-to-study system both for ethical as well as for practical reasons.”
Even simpler, the single-celled organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, otherwise known as brewer’s or baker’s yeast. In 1959, it was discovered that yeast cells were not immortal, dividing only a finite number of times. They are even more evolutionary divergent, though. We haven’t shared a common ancestor with brewer’s yeast for more like a billion years, and only have about 30 percent of their genes in common at this point, but their microscopic size and even faster turnover allows for high-throughput systems able to screen for more than a thousand different compounds a day for potential lifespan-extending properties. And, even if those yeast longevity compounds fail to translate to extending human life, yeast researchers argue they could still be useful for brewing extra beer.
Yeast has a lifespan that can be measured in days; worms in weeks; fruit flies—another common model—in months––compared to mice that can live for years. But, mice and men were one as few as 75 million years ago, arising in the mammalian explosion shortly after the resolution of the asteroid v. dinosaurs matchup. Mice share about 85 percent of their genes with humans. Granted, it’s an important 15 percent.
Humans are not just more complex anatomically than rodents, but more complex even on a cellular level. Extrapolating data from lab animals is infamously fraught with difficulty. Fewer than one in ten cancer drugs that seem to work in mice even make it into human clinical trials, and hundreds of seemingly promising Alzheimer’s drugs have similarly been lost in the translation. As one review in the journal Trends in Biotechnology put it: “Humans Are Not Huge Worms or Big Mice.” We are, however, big primates.
Rhesus monkeys are also used in aging research, though they can live up to 40 years, stretching research timelines. Their DNA is 93 percent identical to humans, though as similarity increases, so too do ethical concerns regarding experimentation. One might expect research on dogs to perhaps be most sensitive, but there are citizen science initiatives in which family dogs are enrolled in noninvasive studies to study––for example, the genetics of why some so-called “Methuselah dogs” reach ages of twenty-five or more. But 99.9 percent of other dogs do not. For example, mixed-breed dogs live more than a year longer than same-size purebred dogs, who can be plagued with certain genetic disorders. Aged pooches suffer many of the same ravages of aging: arthritis, cancer, cataracts, kidney problems, muscle loss, etc. Advances in canine longevity might not only be applicable to human aging, but have the intrinsic value of enhancing the quality and quantity of life of the more than 70 million companions we share our homes with in the U.S. alone.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Blagosklonny MV. Answering the ultimate question “what is the proximal cause of aging?” Aging (Albany NY). 2012;4(12):861-877.
- Levine M, Crimmins E. Not all smokers die young: a model for hidden heterogeneity within the human population. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87403.
- Sangita Devi A. Children living with progeria. NCOAJ. 2017;3(4).
- Chandravanshi SL, Rawat AK, Dwivedi PC, Choudhary P. Ocular manifestations in the Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(6):509-512.
- Ahmed MS, Ikram S, Bibi N, Mir A. Hutchinson-gilford progeria syndrome: a premature aging disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(5):4417-4427.
- Lagunas-Rangel FA. Deciphering the whale’s secrets to have a long life. Exp Gerontol. 2021;151:111425.
- Scott CT, DeFrancesco L. Selling long life. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(1):31-40.
- Sosnowska D, Richardson C, Sonntag WE, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z, Ridgway I. A heart that beats for 500 years: age-related changes in cardiac proteasome activity, oxidative protein damage and expression of heat shock proteins, inflammatory factors, and mitochondrial complexes in Arctica islandica, the longest-living noncolonial animal. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(12):1448-1461.
- López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194-1217.
- Taormina G, Ferrante F, Vieni S, Grassi N, Russo A, Mirisola MG. Longevity: lesson from model organisms. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(7):518.
- Lees H, Walters H, Cox LS. Animal and human models to understand ageing. Maturitas. 2016;93:18-27.
- Burkewitz K, Zhang Y, Mair WB. AMPK at the nexus of energetics and aging. Cell Metab. 2014;20(1):10-25.
- De Robertis EM. Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell. 2008;132(2):185-195.
- Murtey MD, Ramasamy P. Sample preparations for scanning electron microscopy – life sciences. In: Janecek M, Kral R, eds. Modern Electron Microscopy in Physical and Life Sciences. InTech. 2016.
- Mortimer RK, Johnston JR. Life span of individual yeast cells. Nature. 1959;183(4677):1751-1752.
- Douzery EJP, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Delsuc F, Philippe H. The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(43):15386-15391.
- Zimmermann A, Hofer S, Pendl T, Kainz K, Madeo F, Carmona-Gutierrez D. Yeast as a tool to identify anti-aging compounds. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18(6):foy020.
- Sarnoski EA, Liu P, Acar M. A high-throughput screen for yeast replicative lifespan identifies lifespan-extending compounds. Cell Rep. 2017;21(9):2639-2646.
- Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420(6915):520-562.
- Vinogradov AE. Human more complex than mouse at cellular level. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41753.
- Ioannidis JPA. Extrapolating from animals to humans. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(151):151ps15.
- Mak IW, Evaniew N, Ghert M. Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6(2):114-118.
- Shineman DW, Basi GS, Bizon JL, et al. Accelerating drug discovery for Alzheimer’s disease: best practices for preclinical animal studies. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011;3(5):28.
- de Magalhães JP, Stevens M, Thornton D. The business of anti-aging science. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35(11):1062-1073.
- Roth GS, Mattison JA, Ottinger MA, Chachich ME, Lane MA, Ingram DK. Aging in rhesus monkeys: relevance to human health interventions. Science. 2004;305(5689):1423-1426.
- Balasubramanian P, Mattison JA, Anderson RM. Nutrition, metabolism, and targeting aging in nonhuman primates. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:29-35.
- Jónás D, Sándor S, Tátrai K, Egyed B, Kubinyi E. A preliminary study to investigate the genetic background of longevity based on whole-genome sequence data of two methuselah dogs. Front Genet. 2020;11:315.
- Yordy J, Kraus C, Hayward JJ, et al. Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs. Conserv Genet. 2020;21(1):137-148.
- Bellumori TP, Famula TR, Bannasch DL, Belanger JM, Oberbauer AM. Prevalence of inherited disorders among mixed-breed and purebred dogs: 27,254 cases (1995-2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013;242(11):1549-1555.
- Kaeberlein M, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL. The dog aging project: translational geroscience in companion animals. Mamm Genome. 2016;27(7-8):279-288.
- Pitt JN, Kaeberlein M. Why is aging conserved and what can we do about it? PLoS Biol. 2015;13(4):e1002131.
Motion graphics by Avo Media
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
There are numerous ways to try to unlock the mysteries of aging. You could study long-lived individuals like centenarians and supercentenarians, particularly long-lived smokers, perhaps, to uncover the secrets to their resilience. Or, you could go in the opposite direction and study short-lived people—tragic, accelerated aging syndromes like progeria, where children age at eight to ten times the normal rate––wrinkling, balding, and then typically dying around age 13 of a heart attack or stroke.
Or, you could study long-lived animals. There are mammals, such as the bowhead whale, that can live hundreds of years. There are oysters and clams whose hearts can beat more than a billion times over its five-century lifespan. What accounts for the 10,000-fold range of lifespan in the animal kingdom?
Most of the aging pathways identified as the hallmarks of aging were established using so-called “model organisms,” such as yeast, worms, flies, and mice—simpler species that may nonetheless offer insights, due to the remarkable conservation of common aging mechanisms throughout the eons of evolutionary time. Aging used to be considered simply too complex to study––a constellation of internal and external influences too complicated to disentangle. But then, the game changer, the discovery that a single gene mutation could dramatically prolong the lifespan and youthful state of a tiny worm known as C. elegans.
C. elegans has since wormed its way deep into the study of longevity. It seems we shared a common ancestor about a half billion years ago, and, to this day, we still share about half of their genes. With a lifespan of only two to three weeks, their fast turnover allows researchers to rapidly assess the effects of genetic or dietary tweaks, unlike humans, who are described as “not an easy-to-study system both for ethical as well as for practical reasons.”
Even simpler, the single-celled organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, otherwise known as brewer’s or baker’s yeast. In 1959, it was discovered that yeast cells were not immortal, dividing only a finite number of times. They are even more evolutionary divergent, though. We haven’t shared a common ancestor with brewer’s yeast for more like a billion years, and only have about 30 percent of their genes in common at this point, but their microscopic size and even faster turnover allows for high-throughput systems able to screen for more than a thousand different compounds a day for potential lifespan-extending properties. And, even if those yeast longevity compounds fail to translate to extending human life, yeast researchers argue they could still be useful for brewing extra beer.
Yeast has a lifespan that can be measured in days; worms in weeks; fruit flies—another common model—in months––compared to mice that can live for years. But, mice and men were one as few as 75 million years ago, arising in the mammalian explosion shortly after the resolution of the asteroid v. dinosaurs matchup. Mice share about 85 percent of their genes with humans. Granted, it’s an important 15 percent.
Humans are not just more complex anatomically than rodents, but more complex even on a cellular level. Extrapolating data from lab animals is infamously fraught with difficulty. Fewer than one in ten cancer drugs that seem to work in mice even make it into human clinical trials, and hundreds of seemingly promising Alzheimer’s drugs have similarly been lost in the translation. As one review in the journal Trends in Biotechnology put it: “Humans Are Not Huge Worms or Big Mice.” We are, however, big primates.
Rhesus monkeys are also used in aging research, though they can live up to 40 years, stretching research timelines. Their DNA is 93 percent identical to humans, though as similarity increases, so too do ethical concerns regarding experimentation. One might expect research on dogs to perhaps be most sensitive, but there are citizen science initiatives in which family dogs are enrolled in noninvasive studies to study––for example, the genetics of why some so-called “Methuselah dogs” reach ages of twenty-five or more. But 99.9 percent of other dogs do not. For example, mixed-breed dogs live more than a year longer than same-size purebred dogs, who can be plagued with certain genetic disorders. Aged pooches suffer many of the same ravages of aging: arthritis, cancer, cataracts, kidney problems, muscle loss, etc. Advances in canine longevity might not only be applicable to human aging, but have the intrinsic value of enhancing the quality and quantity of life of the more than 70 million companions we share our homes with in the U.S. alone.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Blagosklonny MV. Answering the ultimate question “what is the proximal cause of aging?” Aging (Albany NY). 2012;4(12):861-877.
- Levine M, Crimmins E. Not all smokers die young: a model for hidden heterogeneity within the human population. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87403.
- Sangita Devi A. Children living with progeria. NCOAJ. 2017;3(4).
- Chandravanshi SL, Rawat AK, Dwivedi PC, Choudhary P. Ocular manifestations in the Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(6):509-512.
- Ahmed MS, Ikram S, Bibi N, Mir A. Hutchinson-gilford progeria syndrome: a premature aging disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(5):4417-4427.
- Lagunas-Rangel FA. Deciphering the whale’s secrets to have a long life. Exp Gerontol. 2021;151:111425.
- Scott CT, DeFrancesco L. Selling long life. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(1):31-40.
- Sosnowska D, Richardson C, Sonntag WE, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z, Ridgway I. A heart that beats for 500 years: age-related changes in cardiac proteasome activity, oxidative protein damage and expression of heat shock proteins, inflammatory factors, and mitochondrial complexes in Arctica islandica, the longest-living noncolonial animal. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(12):1448-1461.
- López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194-1217.
- Taormina G, Ferrante F, Vieni S, Grassi N, Russo A, Mirisola MG. Longevity: lesson from model organisms. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(7):518.
- Lees H, Walters H, Cox LS. Animal and human models to understand ageing. Maturitas. 2016;93:18-27.
- Burkewitz K, Zhang Y, Mair WB. AMPK at the nexus of energetics and aging. Cell Metab. 2014;20(1):10-25.
- De Robertis EM. Evo-devo: variations on ancestral themes. Cell. 2008;132(2):185-195.
- Murtey MD, Ramasamy P. Sample preparations for scanning electron microscopy – life sciences. In: Janecek M, Kral R, eds. Modern Electron Microscopy in Physical and Life Sciences. InTech. 2016.
- Mortimer RK, Johnston JR. Life span of individual yeast cells. Nature. 1959;183(4677):1751-1752.
- Douzery EJP, Snell EA, Bapteste E, Delsuc F, Philippe H. The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(43):15386-15391.
- Zimmermann A, Hofer S, Pendl T, Kainz K, Madeo F, Carmona-Gutierrez D. Yeast as a tool to identify anti-aging compounds. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18(6):foy020.
- Sarnoski EA, Liu P, Acar M. A high-throughput screen for yeast replicative lifespan identifies lifespan-extending compounds. Cell Rep. 2017;21(9):2639-2646.
- Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420(6915):520-562.
- Vinogradov AE. Human more complex than mouse at cellular level. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41753.
- Ioannidis JPA. Extrapolating from animals to humans. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(151):151ps15.
- Mak IW, Evaniew N, Ghert M. Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6(2):114-118.
- Shineman DW, Basi GS, Bizon JL, et al. Accelerating drug discovery for Alzheimer’s disease: best practices for preclinical animal studies. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011;3(5):28.
- de Magalhães JP, Stevens M, Thornton D. The business of anti-aging science. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35(11):1062-1073.
- Roth GS, Mattison JA, Ottinger MA, Chachich ME, Lane MA, Ingram DK. Aging in rhesus monkeys: relevance to human health interventions. Science. 2004;305(5689):1423-1426.
- Balasubramanian P, Mattison JA, Anderson RM. Nutrition, metabolism, and targeting aging in nonhuman primates. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:29-35.
- Jónás D, Sándor S, Tátrai K, Egyed B, Kubinyi E. A preliminary study to investigate the genetic background of longevity based on whole-genome sequence data of two methuselah dogs. Front Genet. 2020;11:315.
- Yordy J, Kraus C, Hayward JJ, et al. Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs. Conserv Genet. 2020;21(1):137-148.
- Bellumori TP, Famula TR, Bannasch DL, Belanger JM, Oberbauer AM. Prevalence of inherited disorders among mixed-breed and purebred dogs: 27,254 cases (1995-2010). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013;242(11):1549-1555.
- Kaeberlein M, Creevy KE, Promislow DEL. The dog aging project: translational geroscience in companion animals. Mamm Genome. 2016;27(7-8):279-288.
- Pitt JN, Kaeberlein M. Why is aging conserved and what can we do about it? PLoS Biol. 2015;13(4):e1002131.
Motion graphics by Avo Media
Republishing "There’s a Fly in My Aging Research!"
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
There’s a Fly in My Aging Research!
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
I have a lot of videos that get into the nitty gritty of modulating aging pathways. For example, check out:
- Life Extension with FGF21
- How to Boost FGF21 with Diet for Longevity
- The Best Diet for Healthy Aging
- Naturally Boosting AMPK with Caloric Restriction for Life Extension
- Naturally Boosting AMPK with Exercise for Life Extension
- Does Metformin Work as a Life-Extension Drug?
- Side Effects of Metformin as a Life-Extension Drug
- The TAME Trial: Targeting Aging with Metformin
For more on aging, go to your local public library and check out my longevity book, How Not to Age, available in print, e-book, and audio. (All proceeds I receive from the book are donated directly to charity.)
If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here. Read our important information about translations here.