In one of the largest nutrition studies ever, total meat consumption was significantly associated with weight gain in men and women, and the link remained even after controlling for calories.
“Mainly because of its high energy density and fat content, meat consumption has been considered a determinant of weight gain.” Yeah, but we just looked at nuts, which are dense in calories and fat and they didn’t appear to contribute to weight gain at all. So let’s not presume. “Meat consumption and prospective weight change in participants of the EPIC-PANACEA study.” What is that? “”hundreds of thousands of men and women across 10 countries, with “”weight gain measured over a 5 year period.
What did they find? “”Total meat consumption was positively associated with weight gain in men and women, in normal-weight and overweight subjects, and in smokers and nonsmokers. “”Conclusion: Our results suggest that a decrease in meat consumption may improve weight management. And this was after adjusting for initial weight, physical activity, educational level, smoking status, total energy intake… Wait-a-second—what?! That's the kicker. The link between meat and weight gain remained even after controlling for calories.
One would assume that—sure, meat is associated with weight gain because it’s so packed with calories, and so you’d just get more calories in your daily diet compared to those eating vegetarian, and so more weight gain. But no—it's even more that that. This was after controlling for caloric intake, meaning if have two people eating the same amount of calories—the person eating meat will gain more weight. In fact they even calculated how much more.
An intake of 250 g meat/day--like a steak, would lead to an annual weight gain 422 g higher than the weight gain experienced with an same calorie diet with lower meat content. After 5 y, the weight gain would be about 5 pounds more. Same calories, yet 5 pounds more eating meat. And steak was nothing. “The strongest relation with annual weight change—weight gain--was observed for poultry.”
Let’s say you start out normal weight and eat a hamburger every day. This is how much extra weight beyond what’s already in the calories you’d put on every year. What if instead you had the same amount of calories of processed meat, say a ham sandwich, with three deli slices of ham on it. You’d gain this much extra, whereas, just about a half a chicken breast puts you up here, though the poultry effect was attenuated, evidently, if you remove people who were previously sick and who lied about their diet.“
”In conclusion, our results indicate that meat intake is positively associated with weight gain and this association persisted after adjustment for total energy intake and underlying dietary patterns. Our results are therefore in favor of the public health recommendation to decrease meat consumption for health improvement.”
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Kerry Skinner.
To help out on the site please email firstname.lastname@example.org
What response was there from the meat industry? Find out in tomorrow's video-of-the-day Cattlemen’s Association Has Beef With EPIC Study. For more from the EPIC study see Meat & Multiple Myeloma, Thousands of Vegans Studied, Low Meat or No Meat?, EPIC Findings on Lymphoma, EPIC Study,Omnivores vs. Vegan Nutrient Deficiencies, and Bowel Movement Frequency.
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to my forthcoming videos for free by clicking here.