Fiber isn’t the only thing our good gut bacteria can eat. Starch can also act as a prebiotic.
Resistant Starch and Colon Cancer
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death in the world. Thankfully, the good bacteria in our gut take the fiber we eat and make short-chain fatty acids—like butyrate—that protect us from cancer. We take care of them; they take care of us. If you do nothing to colon cancer cells, they grow. That’s what cancer does. But if you expose colon cancer cells to the concentration of butyrate our good bacteria make in our gut when we eat fiber, the growth is stopped in its tracks. But if the butyrate stops—if we just eat healthy for one day, and then turn off the fiber, the cancer can resume its growth. So, ideally, we have to eat lots of fiber-rich foods, meaning whole plant foods, every single day.
But what about the populations, like in modern sub-Saharan Africa, where they don’t eat a lot of fiber, yet still rarely get colon cancer? They used to eat a lot of fiber, but now their diet is centered around highly refined cornmeal; so, low-fiber, yet still low colon cancer rates. This was explained by the fact that, while they may be lacking protective factors like fiber, they are also lacking cancer-promoting factors, like animal protein and fat. But, are they really lacking protective factors?
If you measure the pH of their stools, the black populations in South Africa have more acidic stools (lower pH means more acidic), despite comparable fiber intakes. As we learned before, that’s a good thing. We want alkaline pee, acidic poop. And that may account for the lower cancer rates.
But wait a second: low colon pH is caused by short-chain fatty acids, which are produced by our good bacteria when they eat fiber. And they weren’t eating any more fiber, suggesting there was something else—in addition to fiber—in their diets that was feeding their flora. And indeed, despite low fiber intake, the bacteria in their colon were still churning out short-chain fatty acids like crazy.
But if their bacteria weren’t eating fiber, what were they eating? Resistant starch. The method of cooking and eating the cornmeal as a porridge resulted in an increase in something called resistant starch, which acts in the same way as fiber in the colon—as a prebiotic, a food for our good bacteria to produce those same cancer-preventing short-chain fatty acids.
Resistant starch is any starch that resists digestion; is not digested and absorbed in the upper digestive tract (our small intestine), and so, passes down into the large bowel (our colon) to feed our good bacteria. See, when you boil starches, and then let them cool, some of the starch can recrystallize into a form resistant to our digestive enzymes. So, we can get resistant starch eating cooled starches: pasta salad, potato salad—or, cold cornmeal porridge.
So, this may help explain the striking differences in colon cancer rates. Thus, they were feeding their good bacteria after all—but just with lots of starch, rather than fiber. Consequently, a high-carbohydrate diet may act in the same way as a high-fiber diet. Because a small fraction of the carbs make it down into our colon, the more carbs we eat, the more butyrate our gut bacteria can produce.
And indeed, countries that eat the most starch have some of the lowest colon cancer rates. So, fiber may not be the only protective factor. Now, only about five percent of starch may reach the colon, compared to 100% of the fiber. But we eat up to ten times more starch than fiber; so, it can potentially play a significant role feeding our flora. So, we’re talking about even non-resistant starch.
So, the protection Africans enjoy from cancer may be twofold: a diet high in resistant starch and low in animal products. Just eating more resistant starch isn’t enough. See, meat contains, or contributes to the production of, presumed carcinogens—such as N-nitroso compounds.
If you split people up into three groups, and you put one group on a low-meat diet; the second group on a high-meat diet, which includes beef, pork, poultry; and the last group on the same high-meat diet, but, with lots of resistant starch added, the high-meat groups had three times more of these presumptive carcinogens, and twice the ammonia in their stool, than the low-meat group. And the addition of the resistant starch did not seem to help. This confirms that exposure to these toxic compounds is increased with meat intake, and 90% were created in our bowel.
So, it doesn’t matter if we get nitrite-free uncured fresh meat; these nitrosamines are created from the meat as it sits in our colon. This may help explain the higher incidence of bowel cancer in meat-eating populations, along with the increase in ammonia—neither of which could be helped by just adding resistant starch on top of the meat.
So, the deleterious effects of animal products on colonic metabolism override the potentially beneficial effects of other protective nutrients. So, we should do a combination of both more whole plant foods, and less meat, along with exercise—not only for our colon, but also for general health.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Katie Schloer.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- S H Duncan, A Belenguer, G Holtrop, A M Johnstone, H J Flint, G E Lobley. Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obese subjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(4):1073-8.
- S J O'Keefe, M Kidd, G Espitalier-Noel, P Owira. Rarity of colon cancer in Africans is associated with low animal product consumption, not fiber. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 May;94(5):1373-80.
- S J D O'Keefe, D Chung, N Mahmoud, A R Sepulveda, M Manafe, J Arch, H Adada, T van der Merwe. Why do African Americans get more colon cancer than Native Africans? J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1 Suppl):175S-182S.
- J Ou, J P DeLany, M Zhang, S Sharma, S J O'Keefe. Association between low colonic short-chain fatty acids and high bile acids in high colon cancer risk populations. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(1):34-40.
- S J O'Keefe, J Ou, S Aufreiter, D O'Connor, S Sharma, J Sepulveda, T Fukuwatari, K Shibata. T Mawhinney. Products of the colonic microbiota mediate the effects of diet on colon cancer risk. J Nutr. 2009 Nov;139(11):2044-8.
- P Louis, G L Hold, H J Flint. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Oct;12(10):661-72.
- Fechner A, K Fenske, G Jahreis. Effects of legume kernel fibres and citrus fibre on putative risk factors for colorectal cancer: a randomised, double-blind, crossover human intervention trial. Nutr J. 2013 Jul 16;12:101.
- S Archer, S Meng, J Wu, J Johnson, R Tang, R Hodin. Butyrate inhibits colon carcinoma cell growth through two distinct pathways. Surgery. 1998 Aug;124(2):248-53.
- J A Higgins, I L Brown. Resistant starch: a promising dietary agent for the prevention/treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and bowel cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;29(2):190-4.
- K R Silvester, S A Bingham, J R Pollock, J H Cummings, I K O'Neill. Effect of meat and resistant starch on fecal excretion of apparent N-nitroso compounds and ammonia from the human large bowel. Nutr Cancer. 1997;29(1):13-23.
- A Cassidy, S A Bingham, J H Cummings. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. Br J Cancer. 1994 May;69(5):937-42.
- A R Walker, B F Walker, A J Walker. Faecal pH, dietary fibre intake, and proneness to colon cancer in four South African populations. Br J Cancer. 1986 Apr;53(4):489-95.
- J A McBain, A Eastman, C S Nobel, G C Mueller. Apoptotic death in adenocarcinoma cell lines induced by butyrate and other histone deacetylase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997 May 9;53(9):1357-68.
- R Ahmed, I Segal, H Hassan. Fermentation of dietary starch in humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Apr;95(4):1017-20.
Image thanks to Ed Uthman via flickr
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death in the world. Thankfully, the good bacteria in our gut take the fiber we eat and make short-chain fatty acids—like butyrate—that protect us from cancer. We take care of them; they take care of us. If you do nothing to colon cancer cells, they grow. That’s what cancer does. But if you expose colon cancer cells to the concentration of butyrate our good bacteria make in our gut when we eat fiber, the growth is stopped in its tracks. But if the butyrate stops—if we just eat healthy for one day, and then turn off the fiber, the cancer can resume its growth. So, ideally, we have to eat lots of fiber-rich foods, meaning whole plant foods, every single day.
But what about the populations, like in modern sub-Saharan Africa, where they don’t eat a lot of fiber, yet still rarely get colon cancer? They used to eat a lot of fiber, but now their diet is centered around highly refined cornmeal; so, low-fiber, yet still low colon cancer rates. This was explained by the fact that, while they may be lacking protective factors like fiber, they are also lacking cancer-promoting factors, like animal protein and fat. But, are they really lacking protective factors?
If you measure the pH of their stools, the black populations in South Africa have more acidic stools (lower pH means more acidic), despite comparable fiber intakes. As we learned before, that’s a good thing. We want alkaline pee, acidic poop. And that may account for the lower cancer rates.
But wait a second: low colon pH is caused by short-chain fatty acids, which are produced by our good bacteria when they eat fiber. And they weren’t eating any more fiber, suggesting there was something else—in addition to fiber—in their diets that was feeding their flora. And indeed, despite low fiber intake, the bacteria in their colon were still churning out short-chain fatty acids like crazy.
But if their bacteria weren’t eating fiber, what were they eating? Resistant starch. The method of cooking and eating the cornmeal as a porridge resulted in an increase in something called resistant starch, which acts in the same way as fiber in the colon—as a prebiotic, a food for our good bacteria to produce those same cancer-preventing short-chain fatty acids.
Resistant starch is any starch that resists digestion; is not digested and absorbed in the upper digestive tract (our small intestine), and so, passes down into the large bowel (our colon) to feed our good bacteria. See, when you boil starches, and then let them cool, some of the starch can recrystallize into a form resistant to our digestive enzymes. So, we can get resistant starch eating cooled starches: pasta salad, potato salad—or, cold cornmeal porridge.
So, this may help explain the striking differences in colon cancer rates. Thus, they were feeding their good bacteria after all—but just with lots of starch, rather than fiber. Consequently, a high-carbohydrate diet may act in the same way as a high-fiber diet. Because a small fraction of the carbs make it down into our colon, the more carbs we eat, the more butyrate our gut bacteria can produce.
And indeed, countries that eat the most starch have some of the lowest colon cancer rates. So, fiber may not be the only protective factor. Now, only about five percent of starch may reach the colon, compared to 100% of the fiber. But we eat up to ten times more starch than fiber; so, it can potentially play a significant role feeding our flora. So, we’re talking about even non-resistant starch.
So, the protection Africans enjoy from cancer may be twofold: a diet high in resistant starch and low in animal products. Just eating more resistant starch isn’t enough. See, meat contains, or contributes to the production of, presumed carcinogens—such as N-nitroso compounds.
If you split people up into three groups, and you put one group on a low-meat diet; the second group on a high-meat diet, which includes beef, pork, poultry; and the last group on the same high-meat diet, but, with lots of resistant starch added, the high-meat groups had three times more of these presumptive carcinogens, and twice the ammonia in their stool, than the low-meat group. And the addition of the resistant starch did not seem to help. This confirms that exposure to these toxic compounds is increased with meat intake, and 90% were created in our bowel.
So, it doesn’t matter if we get nitrite-free uncured fresh meat; these nitrosamines are created from the meat as it sits in our colon. This may help explain the higher incidence of bowel cancer in meat-eating populations, along with the increase in ammonia—neither of which could be helped by just adding resistant starch on top of the meat.
So, the deleterious effects of animal products on colonic metabolism override the potentially beneficial effects of other protective nutrients. So, we should do a combination of both more whole plant foods, and less meat, along with exercise—not only for our colon, but also for general health.
To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. This is just an approximation of the audio contributed by Katie Schloer.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- S H Duncan, A Belenguer, G Holtrop, A M Johnstone, H J Flint, G E Lobley. Reduced dietary intake of carbohydrates by obese subjects results in decreased concentrations of butyrate and butyrate-producing bacteria in feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(4):1073-8.
- S J O'Keefe, M Kidd, G Espitalier-Noel, P Owira. Rarity of colon cancer in Africans is associated with low animal product consumption, not fiber. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 May;94(5):1373-80.
- S J D O'Keefe, D Chung, N Mahmoud, A R Sepulveda, M Manafe, J Arch, H Adada, T van der Merwe. Why do African Americans get more colon cancer than Native Africans? J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1 Suppl):175S-182S.
- J Ou, J P DeLany, M Zhang, S Sharma, S J O'Keefe. Association between low colonic short-chain fatty acids and high bile acids in high colon cancer risk populations. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(1):34-40.
- S J O'Keefe, J Ou, S Aufreiter, D O'Connor, S Sharma, J Sepulveda, T Fukuwatari, K Shibata. T Mawhinney. Products of the colonic microbiota mediate the effects of diet on colon cancer risk. J Nutr. 2009 Nov;139(11):2044-8.
- P Louis, G L Hold, H J Flint. The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014 Oct;12(10):661-72.
- Fechner A, K Fenske, G Jahreis. Effects of legume kernel fibres and citrus fibre on putative risk factors for colorectal cancer: a randomised, double-blind, crossover human intervention trial. Nutr J. 2013 Jul 16;12:101.
- S Archer, S Meng, J Wu, J Johnson, R Tang, R Hodin. Butyrate inhibits colon carcinoma cell growth through two distinct pathways. Surgery. 1998 Aug;124(2):248-53.
- J A Higgins, I L Brown. Resistant starch: a promising dietary agent for the prevention/treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and bowel cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;29(2):190-4.
- K R Silvester, S A Bingham, J R Pollock, J H Cummings, I K O'Neill. Effect of meat and resistant starch on fecal excretion of apparent N-nitroso compounds and ammonia from the human large bowel. Nutr Cancer. 1997;29(1):13-23.
- A Cassidy, S A Bingham, J H Cummings. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. Br J Cancer. 1994 May;69(5):937-42.
- A R Walker, B F Walker, A J Walker. Faecal pH, dietary fibre intake, and proneness to colon cancer in four South African populations. Br J Cancer. 1986 Apr;53(4):489-95.
- J A McBain, A Eastman, C S Nobel, G C Mueller. Apoptotic death in adenocarcinoma cell lines induced by butyrate and other histone deacetylase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997 May 9;53(9):1357-68.
- R Ahmed, I Segal, H Hassan. Fermentation of dietary starch in humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Apr;95(4):1017-20.
Image thanks to Ed Uthman via flickr
Republishing "Resistant Starch and Colon Cancer"
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
Resistant Starch and Colon Cancer
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
This video is a follow-up to Is the Fiber Theory Wrong?.
What exactly is butyrate? See:
- Bowel Wars: Hydrogen Sulfide vs. Butyrate
- Prebiotics: Tending Our Inner Garden
- Treating Ulcerative Colitis with Diet
- Boosting Good Bacteria in the Colon Without Probiotics
For videos on optimizing your gut flora, see:
- Microbiome: The Inside Story
- What’s Your Gut Microbiome Enterotype?
- How to Change Your Enterotype
- Gut Dysbiosis: Starving Our Microbial Self
- How to Reduce Carcinogenic Bile Acid Production
- Effect of Sucralose (Splenda) on the Microbiome
Interested in more on preventing colon cancer? See:
- Starving Cancer with Methionine Restriction
- Stool pH and Colon Cancer
- Solving a Colon Cancer Mystery
If you’re eating healthfully, do you need a colonoscopy? Find out in Should We All Get Colonoscopies Starting at Age 50?.
When regular starches are cooked and then cooled, some of the starch recrystallizes into resistant starch. For this reason, pasta salad can be healthier than hot pasta, and potato salad healthier than a baked potato. Find out more in my video Getting Starch to Take the Path of Most Resistance.
If you haven't yet, you can subscribe to our free newsletter. With your subscription, you'll also get notifications for just-released blogs and videos. Check out our information page about our translated resources.