How can you get a perfect diet score?
Plant-Based Eating Score Put to the Test
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
How do you rate the quality of people’s diets? Well, what could be more nutrient dense than a vegetarian diet? Indeed, if you compare the diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets, the more plant-based diets do tend to win out, and the higher diet quality in vegetarian diets may help explain better improvements in health outcomes. However, vegetarians appeared to have higher refined grain intake, eating more foods like white rice and white bread that have been stripped of much of their nutrition. So, just because you’re eating a vegetarian diet doesn’t mean you’re necessarily eating optimally healthy.
Those familiar with the science know the primary health importance of eating whole plant foods. So, how about a scoring system that just adds up how many cups of fruit, and vegetables, and whole grains, and beans or chickpeas or split peas or lentils, and how many ounces of nuts and seeds per 1,000 calories, with or without counting white potatoes. Well, just looking at the total intake of whole plant foods doesn’t mean you’re not also stuffing doughnuts in your face. So, you could imagine proportional intake measures, based on calories or weight, to determine the proportion of your diet that’s whole plant foods. In that case, you’d get docked points if you eat things like animal-derived foods—meat, dairy, or eggs—or added sugars and fats.
My favorite proportional intake measure is McCarty’s Phytochemical Index, which I profiled previously. I love it because of its sheer simplicity, defined as the percent of dietary calories derived from foods rich in phytochemicals. So, it’s a score from 0 to 100, the percentage of your calories that are derived from foods rich in phytochemicals, which are biologically-active substances naturally found in plants that may be contributing to many of the health benefits obtained from eating whole plant foods. I mean, monitoring phytochemical intake in the clinical setting could have great utility in assisting people with optimizing their dietary intake for optimal health and disease prevention. However, the quantification of phytochemicals in foods or tissue samples is impractical—expensive, laborious; but hey, this concept of a ‘phytochemical index’ (PI) score could be an alternative, simple method of monitoring phytochemical intake.
Theoretically, a whole food, plant-based or vegan diet that excluded refined grains, white potatoes, hard liquors, and added sugars and oils could achieve a perfect score of 100, whereas sadly, the most current American diets might be lucky to hit 20. Let’s see what’s going on. In 1998, our shopping baskets were filled with about 20 percent whole plant foods, and more recently that has actually shrunk.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if researchers used this index to try to correlate it with health outcomes. That’s exactly what they did. Look, we know that studies have demonstrated vegetarian diets have a protective association with weight and body mass index—five dozen studies have shown that vegetarians had significantly lower weight and BMI compared with non-vegetarians. And even more studies show that high intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and beans may be protective, regardless of meat consumption. So, researchers wanted to use an index that gave points for whole plant foods. They used a phytochemical index, and tracked people’s weight over a few years––which I profiled in my video, ”Calculate Your Healthy Eating Score”––on a scale of 0 to 100, simply reflecting what percentage of your diet is whole plant foods. And even though the healthiest eating tier only averaged a score of about 40, which meant the bulk of their diet was still made up of processed foods and animal products, just making whole plant foods a substantial portion of the diet may prevent weight gain and decrease body fat. So, it’s not all or nothing. Any steps we can make to increase our whole plant food intake may be beneficial.
A couple more studies have been performed since, and they all point in the same direction. About a third of the odds of abdominal obesity at higher healthy plant intake, and significantly lower odds of high triglycerides. So, the index may be a useful dietary target for weight loss, where there is less focus on calorie intake and more on increasing intake of these high-nutrient lower-calorie foods over time. The latest such study, published 2020, suggests the same is true for childhood obesity.
Even at the same weight, the same amount of belly fat, those eating plant-based have higher insulin sensitivity, meaning the insulin they make works better in their body, perhaps thanks to the compounds in plants that alleviate inflammation and quench free radicals. And indeed, things seemed to improve as people ate more and more plants.
No wonder researchers found 91 percent lower odds of prediabetes for people getting more than half their calories from healthy plant foods. Significantly lower odds of metabolic syndrome and high blood pressure. Only about half the odds of being diagnosed with hypertension over a three-year period among those eating more plants. Even mental health was impacted; about 80 percent less depression, 2/3 less anxiety, 70 percent less psychological distress.
What about the Dietary Phytochemical Index and benign breast diseases, such as fibrocystic diseases, ductal ectasia, fatty necrosis, and all sorts of benign tumors? The same thing was found. Seventy percent lower odds. OK, but what about breast cancer? A higher intake of healthy plant foods was indeed associated with lower risk of breast cancer, even after controlling for a long list of other factors. And not just by a little bit. Eating twice the proportion of plants compared to the standard American diet was linked to more than 90 percent lower odds of breast cancer.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Waijers PMCM, Feskens EJM, Ocké MC. A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr. 2007;97(2):219-31.
- Van Horn L. Achieving nutrient density: a vegetarian approach. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(6):799.
- Parker HW, Vadiveloo MK. Diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(3):144-60.
- Lipsky LM, Cheon K, Nansel TR, Albert PS. Candidate measures of whole plant food intake are related to biomarkers of nutrition and health in the US population (National health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2002). Nutr Res. 2012;32(4):251-9.
- McCarty MF. Proposal for a dietary “phytochemical index.” Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(5):813-7.
- Temple NJ. What is the optimum research strategy to study the effects of phytochemicals on disease prevention? Nutrition. 2012;28(6):611-2.
- Vincent HK, Bourguignon CM, Taylor AG. Relationship of the dietary phytochemical index to weight gain, oxidative stress and inflammation in overweight young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23(1):20-9.
- Volpe R, Okrent AM. Assessing the Healthfulness of Consumers’ Grocery Purchases. Department of Agricultture Economic Research Service; Washington, DC, USA: 2012. EIB-102.
- Mirmiran P, Bahadoran Z, Golzarand M, Shiva N, Azizi F. Association between dietary phytochemical index and 3-year changes in weight, waist circumference and body adiposity index in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose study. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012;9(1):108.
- Carnauba RA, Chaves DFS, Baptistella AB, Paschoal V, Naves A, Buehler AM. Association between high consumption of phytochemical-rich foods and anthropometric measures: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;68(2):158-66.
- Bahadoran Z, Golzarand M, Mirmiran P, Saadati N, Azizi F. The association of dietary phytochemical index and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26 Suppl 1:145-53.
- Eslami O, Khoshgoo M, Shidfar F. Dietary phytochemical index and overweight/obesity in children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):132.
- Cui X, Wang B, Wu Y, et al. Vegetarians have a lower fasting insulin level and higher insulin sensitivity than matched omnivores: A cross-sectional study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(5):467-73.
- Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Tohidi M, Azizi F. Dietary phytochemical index and the risk of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction: a prospective approach in Tehran lipid and glucose study. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(8):950-5.
- Abshirini M, Mahaki B, Bagheri F, Siassi F, Koohdani F, Sotoudeh G. Higher intake of phytochemical-rich foods is inversely related to prediabetes: a case-control study. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:64.
- Kim M, Park K. Association between phytochemical index and metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res Pract. 2020;14(3):252-61.
- Golzarand M, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Sadeghian-Sharif S, Azizi F. Dietary phytochemical index is inversely associated with the occurrence of hypertension in adults: a 3-year follow-up (The tehran lipid and glucose study). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):392-8.
- Darooghegi Mofrad M, Siassi F, Guilani B, Bellissimo N, Azadbakht L. Association of dietary phytochemical index and mental health in women: a cross-sectional study. Br J Nutr. 2019;121(9):1049-56.
- Aghababayan S, Sheikhi Mobarakeh Z, Qorbani M, et al. Dietary phytochemical index and benign breast diseases: a case-control study. Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(6):1067-73.
- Bahadoran Z, Karimi Z, Houshiar-rad A, Mirzayi H-R, Rashidkhani B. Dietary phytochemical index and the risk of breast cancer: a case control study in a population of Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):2747-51.
Video production by Glass Entertainment
Motion graphics by Avo Media
- animal products
- anxiety
- beans
- blood pressure
- bread
- breast cancer
- calories
- chickpeas
- dairy
- depression
- eggs
- fat
- fruit
- grains
- high blood pressure
- hypertension
- legumes
- lentils
- meat
- mental health
- nuts
- obesity
- oils
- phytonutrients
- Plant-Based Diets
- potatoes
- rice
- seeds
- split peas
- standard American diet
- sugar
- triglycerides
- vegans
- vegetables
- vegetarians
- women's health
Below is an approximation of this video’s audio content. To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video.
How do you rate the quality of people’s diets? Well, what could be more nutrient dense than a vegetarian diet? Indeed, if you compare the diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets, the more plant-based diets do tend to win out, and the higher diet quality in vegetarian diets may help explain better improvements in health outcomes. However, vegetarians appeared to have higher refined grain intake, eating more foods like white rice and white bread that have been stripped of much of their nutrition. So, just because you’re eating a vegetarian diet doesn’t mean you’re necessarily eating optimally healthy.
Those familiar with the science know the primary health importance of eating whole plant foods. So, how about a scoring system that just adds up how many cups of fruit, and vegetables, and whole grains, and beans or chickpeas or split peas or lentils, and how many ounces of nuts and seeds per 1,000 calories, with or without counting white potatoes. Well, just looking at the total intake of whole plant foods doesn’t mean you’re not also stuffing doughnuts in your face. So, you could imagine proportional intake measures, based on calories or weight, to determine the proportion of your diet that’s whole plant foods. In that case, you’d get docked points if you eat things like animal-derived foods—meat, dairy, or eggs—or added sugars and fats.
My favorite proportional intake measure is McCarty’s Phytochemical Index, which I profiled previously. I love it because of its sheer simplicity, defined as the percent of dietary calories derived from foods rich in phytochemicals. So, it’s a score from 0 to 100, the percentage of your calories that are derived from foods rich in phytochemicals, which are biologically-active substances naturally found in plants that may be contributing to many of the health benefits obtained from eating whole plant foods. I mean, monitoring phytochemical intake in the clinical setting could have great utility in assisting people with optimizing their dietary intake for optimal health and disease prevention. However, the quantification of phytochemicals in foods or tissue samples is impractical—expensive, laborious; but hey, this concept of a ‘phytochemical index’ (PI) score could be an alternative, simple method of monitoring phytochemical intake.
Theoretically, a whole food, plant-based or vegan diet that excluded refined grains, white potatoes, hard liquors, and added sugars and oils could achieve a perfect score of 100, whereas sadly, the most current American diets might be lucky to hit 20. Let’s see what’s going on. In 1998, our shopping baskets were filled with about 20 percent whole plant foods, and more recently that has actually shrunk.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if researchers used this index to try to correlate it with health outcomes. That’s exactly what they did. Look, we know that studies have demonstrated vegetarian diets have a protective association with weight and body mass index—five dozen studies have shown that vegetarians had significantly lower weight and BMI compared with non-vegetarians. And even more studies show that high intakes of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and beans may be protective, regardless of meat consumption. So, researchers wanted to use an index that gave points for whole plant foods. They used a phytochemical index, and tracked people’s weight over a few years––which I profiled in my video, ”Calculate Your Healthy Eating Score”––on a scale of 0 to 100, simply reflecting what percentage of your diet is whole plant foods. And even though the healthiest eating tier only averaged a score of about 40, which meant the bulk of their diet was still made up of processed foods and animal products, just making whole plant foods a substantial portion of the diet may prevent weight gain and decrease body fat. So, it’s not all or nothing. Any steps we can make to increase our whole plant food intake may be beneficial.
A couple more studies have been performed since, and they all point in the same direction. About a third of the odds of abdominal obesity at higher healthy plant intake, and significantly lower odds of high triglycerides. So, the index may be a useful dietary target for weight loss, where there is less focus on calorie intake and more on increasing intake of these high-nutrient lower-calorie foods over time. The latest such study, published 2020, suggests the same is true for childhood obesity.
Even at the same weight, the same amount of belly fat, those eating plant-based have higher insulin sensitivity, meaning the insulin they make works better in their body, perhaps thanks to the compounds in plants that alleviate inflammation and quench free radicals. And indeed, things seemed to improve as people ate more and more plants.
No wonder researchers found 91 percent lower odds of prediabetes for people getting more than half their calories from healthy plant foods. Significantly lower odds of metabolic syndrome and high blood pressure. Only about half the odds of being diagnosed with hypertension over a three-year period among those eating more plants. Even mental health was impacted; about 80 percent less depression, 2/3 less anxiety, 70 percent less psychological distress.
What about the Dietary Phytochemical Index and benign breast diseases, such as fibrocystic diseases, ductal ectasia, fatty necrosis, and all sorts of benign tumors? The same thing was found. Seventy percent lower odds. OK, but what about breast cancer? A higher intake of healthy plant foods was indeed associated with lower risk of breast cancer, even after controlling for a long list of other factors. And not just by a little bit. Eating twice the proportion of plants compared to the standard American diet was linked to more than 90 percent lower odds of breast cancer.
Please consider volunteering to help out on the site.
- Waijers PMCM, Feskens EJM, Ocké MC. A critical review of predefined diet quality scores. Br J Nutr. 2007;97(2):219-31.
- Van Horn L. Achieving nutrient density: a vegetarian approach. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(6):799.
- Parker HW, Vadiveloo MK. Diet quality of vegetarian diets compared with nonvegetarian diets: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2019;77(3):144-60.
- Lipsky LM, Cheon K, Nansel TR, Albert PS. Candidate measures of whole plant food intake are related to biomarkers of nutrition and health in the US population (National health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2002). Nutr Res. 2012;32(4):251-9.
- McCarty MF. Proposal for a dietary “phytochemical index.” Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(5):813-7.
- Temple NJ. What is the optimum research strategy to study the effects of phytochemicals on disease prevention? Nutrition. 2012;28(6):611-2.
- Vincent HK, Bourguignon CM, Taylor AG. Relationship of the dietary phytochemical index to weight gain, oxidative stress and inflammation in overweight young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23(1):20-9.
- Volpe R, Okrent AM. Assessing the Healthfulness of Consumers’ Grocery Purchases. Department of Agricultture Economic Research Service; Washington, DC, USA: 2012. EIB-102.
- Mirmiran P, Bahadoran Z, Golzarand M, Shiva N, Azizi F. Association between dietary phytochemical index and 3-year changes in weight, waist circumference and body adiposity index in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose study. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2012;9(1):108.
- Carnauba RA, Chaves DFS, Baptistella AB, Paschoal V, Naves A, Buehler AM. Association between high consumption of phytochemical-rich foods and anthropometric measures: a systematic review. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017;68(2):158-66.
- Bahadoran Z, Golzarand M, Mirmiran P, Saadati N, Azizi F. The association of dietary phytochemical index and cardiometabolic risk factors in adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013;26 Suppl 1:145-53.
- Eslami O, Khoshgoo M, Shidfar F. Dietary phytochemical index and overweight/obesity in children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):132.
- Cui X, Wang B, Wu Y, et al. Vegetarians have a lower fasting insulin level and higher insulin sensitivity than matched omnivores: A cross-sectional study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019;29(5):467-73.
- Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Tohidi M, Azizi F. Dietary phytochemical index and the risk of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction: a prospective approach in Tehran lipid and glucose study. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2015;66(8):950-5.
- Abshirini M, Mahaki B, Bagheri F, Siassi F, Koohdani F, Sotoudeh G. Higher intake of phytochemical-rich foods is inversely related to prediabetes: a case-control study. Int J Prev Med. 2018;9:64.
- Kim M, Park K. Association between phytochemical index and metabolic syndrome. Nutr Res Pract. 2020;14(3):252-61.
- Golzarand M, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Sadeghian-Sharif S, Azizi F. Dietary phytochemical index is inversely associated with the occurrence of hypertension in adults: a 3-year follow-up (The tehran lipid and glucose study). Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):392-8.
- Darooghegi Mofrad M, Siassi F, Guilani B, Bellissimo N, Azadbakht L. Association of dietary phytochemical index and mental health in women: a cross-sectional study. Br J Nutr. 2019;121(9):1049-56.
- Aghababayan S, Sheikhi Mobarakeh Z, Qorbani M, et al. Dietary phytochemical index and benign breast diseases: a case-control study. Nutr Cancer. 2020;72(6):1067-73.
- Bahadoran Z, Karimi Z, Houshiar-rad A, Mirzayi H-R, Rashidkhani B. Dietary phytochemical index and the risk of breast cancer: a case control study in a population of Iranian women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):2747-51.
Video production by Glass Entertainment
Motion graphics by Avo Media
- animal products
- anxiety
- beans
- blood pressure
- bread
- breast cancer
- calories
- chickpeas
- dairy
- depression
- eggs
- fat
- fruit
- grains
- high blood pressure
- hypertension
- legumes
- lentils
- meat
- mental health
- nuts
- obesity
- oils
- phytonutrients
- Plant-Based Diets
- potatoes
- rice
- seeds
- split peas
- standard American diet
- sugar
- triglycerides
- vegans
- vegetables
- vegetarians
- women's health
Republishing "Plant-Based Eating Score Put to the Test"
You may republish this material online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You must attribute the article to NutritionFacts.org with a link back to our website in your republication.
If any changes are made to the original text or video, you must indicate, reasonably, what has changed about the article or video.
You may not use our material for commercial purposes.
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.
If you have any questions, please Contact Us
Plant-Based Eating Score Put to the Test
LicenseCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Content URLDoctor's Note
You can learn more about the phytochemical index in my earlier video, Calculate Your Healthy Eating Score.
Do Vegetarians Get Enough Protein? Watch the video to find out.
It doesn’t have to be all or nothing, though. Do Flexitarians Live Longer?
For more on plant-based junk, check out Is Vegan Food Always Healthy?
Update: Check out my newer video, The Negative Effects and Benefits of Plant-Based Diets.
If you haven’t yet, you can subscribe to my videos for free by clicking here. Read our important information about translations here.